Author
Listed:
- A. K. Mandal
(Florida Atlantic University)
- Madan Thapa Chhetri
(Florida Atlantic University
Lehigh University)
- Fred Bloetscher
(Florida Atlantic University)
- Yan Yong
(Florida Atlantic University)
- Hongbo Su
(Florida Atlantic University)
Abstract
Flood risk assessment is essential for minimizing the adverse impacts of flooding on communities, particularly in regions experiencing more frequent and intense precipitation events. While existing flood modeling and mapping tools are widely used, workflows often require extensive manual processing especially when dealing with multi-basin and multi-scenario analyses which can affect efficiency and consistency. This study presents a semi-automated workflow designed to streamline flood risk modeling, mapping, and impact assessment using Python scripting within the ArcGIS Pro environment. The approach automates key steps including geoprocessing, hydrologic input preparation, map generation, and impact analysis, significantly reducing processing time by approximately 85% while ensuring uniformity across scenarios. The workflow was applied to generate 48 distinct flood scenarios incorporating rainfall, sea level rise, and tidal conditions. It includes probabilistic flood risk mapping using z-score calculations to account for modeling and elevation uncertainties. A case study from North Miami; Florida demonstrates how this semi-automated method improves efficiency and reproducibility in support of planning and decision-making. The proposed framework offers a flexible, scalable solution for local governments and water resource managers seeking timely, data-driven strategies for flood mitigation.
Suggested Citation
A. K. Mandal & Madan Thapa Chhetri & Fred Bloetscher & Yan Yong & Hongbo Su, 2025.
"Semi-automated workflow for multi-basin, multi-scenario flood risk modeling, mapping, and impact assessment,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(12), pages 14425-14441, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07361-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07361-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07361-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.