IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i12d10.1007_s11069-025-07361-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semi-automated workflow for multi-basin, multi-scenario flood risk modeling, mapping, and impact assessment

Author

Listed:
  • A. K. Mandal

    (Florida Atlantic University)

  • Madan Thapa Chhetri

    (Florida Atlantic University
    Lehigh University)

  • Fred Bloetscher

    (Florida Atlantic University)

  • Yan Yong

    (Florida Atlantic University)

  • Hongbo Su

    (Florida Atlantic University)

Abstract

Flood risk assessment is essential for minimizing the adverse impacts of flooding on communities, particularly in regions experiencing more frequent and intense precipitation events. While existing flood modeling and mapping tools are widely used, workflows often require extensive manual processing especially when dealing with multi-basin and multi-scenario analyses which can affect efficiency and consistency. This study presents a semi-automated workflow designed to streamline flood risk modeling, mapping, and impact assessment using Python scripting within the ArcGIS Pro environment. The approach automates key steps including geoprocessing, hydrologic input preparation, map generation, and impact analysis, significantly reducing processing time by approximately 85% while ensuring uniformity across scenarios. The workflow was applied to generate 48 distinct flood scenarios incorporating rainfall, sea level rise, and tidal conditions. It includes probabilistic flood risk mapping using z-score calculations to account for modeling and elevation uncertainties. A case study from North Miami; Florida demonstrates how this semi-automated method improves efficiency and reproducibility in support of planning and decision-making. The proposed framework offers a flexible, scalable solution for local governments and water resource managers seeking timely, data-driven strategies for flood mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • A. K. Mandal & Madan Thapa Chhetri & Fred Bloetscher & Yan Yong & Hongbo Su, 2025. "Semi-automated workflow for multi-basin, multi-scenario flood risk modeling, mapping, and impact assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(12), pages 14425-14441, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07361-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07361-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07361-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07361-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gangwal, Utkarsh & Dong, Shangjia, 2022. "Critical facility accessibility rapid failure early-warning detection and redundancy mapping in urban flooding," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Jean-Claude Baraka Munyaka & Jérôme Chenal & Sizwe Mabaso & Samkele Sikhulile Tfwala & Anil Kumar Mandal, 2024. "Geospatial Tools and Remote Sensing Strategies for Timely Humanitarian Response: A Case Study on Drought Monitoring in Eswatini," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. P. C. D. Milly & R. T. Wetherald & K. A. Dunne & T. L. Delworth, 2002. "Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6871), pages 514-517, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barati, Hojjat & Yazici, Anil & Almotahari, Amirmasoud, 2024. "A methodology for ranking of critical links in transportation networks based on criticality score distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. P. V. Timbadiya & K. M. Krishnamraju, 2023. "A 2D hydrodynamic model for river flood prediction in a coastal floodplain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1143-1165, January.
    3. Berlemann, Michael, 2015. "Hurricane Risk, Happiness and Life Satisfaction. Some Empirical Evidence on the Indirect Effects of Natural Disasters," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113073, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Álvarez, Xana & Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2019. "Risk prevention of land flood: A cooperative game theory approach," MPRA Paper 91515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Abedifar, Pejman & Kashizadeh, Seyed Javad & Ongena, Steven, 2024. "Flood, farms and credit: The role of branch banking in the era of climate change," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Teodor Kitczak & Heidi Jänicke & Marek Bury & Ryszard Malinowski, 2021. "The Usefulness of Mixtures with Festulolium braunii for the Regeneration of Grassland under Progressive Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Zbigniew Kundzewicz & Nicola Lugeri & Rutger Dankers & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Petra Döll & Iwona Pińskwar & Tomasz Dysarz & Stefan Hochrainer & Piotr Matczak, 2010. "Assessing river flood risk and adaptation in Europe—review of projections for the future," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 641-656, October.
    8. Michael Bernardi & Christa Hainz & Paulina Maier & Maria Waldinger, 2023. "A “Green Revolution” for Sub-Saharan Africa? Challenges and Opportunities," EconPol Policy Brief 54, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Weili Duan & Bin He & Daniel Nover & Jingli Fan & Guishan Yang & Wen Chen & Huifang Meng & Chuanming Liu, 2016. "Floods and associated socioeconomic damages in China over the last century," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 401-413, May.
    10. Aparna Gupta & Abena Owusu & Jue Wang, 2024. "Assessing U.S. insurance firms' climate change impact and response," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(3), pages 571-604, July.
    11. Pratyush Tripathy & Teja Malladi, 2022. "Global Flood Mapper: a novel Google Earth Engine application for rapid flood mapping using Sentinel-1 SAR," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1341-1363, November.
    12. Sechindra Vallury & Bryan Leonard, 2022. "Canals, climate, and corruption: The provisioning of public infrastructure under uncertainty," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 221-252, March.
    13. Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi & Israel Fernández-Martínez & Axel Lara-Omaña & Carlos Rosales-Armendariz & Tereza Cavazos & Ligia Pérez-Cruz & Julián Zapotitla-Roman, 2025. "LiDAR and photogrammetric study of the Acapulco bay after the October 2023 Otis hurricane in southern Mexico," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(13), pages 15733-15750, July.
    14. repec:fpr:2020cp:5(5 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Jan Skála & Radim Vácha & Pavel Čupr, 2018. "Which Compounds Contribute Most to Elevated Soil Pollution and the Corresponding Health Risks in Floodplains in the Headwater Areas of the Central European Watershed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. David Ocio & Christian Stocker & Ángel Eraso & Arantza Martínez & José María Sanz Galdeano, 2016. "Towards a reliable and cost-efficient flood risk management: the case of the Basque Country (Spain)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 617-639, March.
    17. Yun Xing & Huili Chen & Qiuhua Liang & Xieyao Ma, 2022. "Improving the performance of city-scale hydrodynamic flood modelling through a GIS-based DEM correction method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 2313-2335, July.
    18. David Marcolino Nielsen & Marcio Cataldi & André Luiz Belém & Ana Luiza Spadano Albuquerque, 2016. "Local indices for the South American monsoon system and its impacts on Southeast Brazilian precipitation patterns," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 909-928, September.
    19. Cavalieri, Francesco & Franchin, Paolo & Giovinazzi, Sonia, 2023. "Multi-hazard assessment of increased flooding hazard due to earthquake-induced damage to the natural drainage system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Navin Bhatta & Shakhawat H. Tanim & Pamela Murray-Tuite, 2024. "Dynamics of Link Importance through Normal Conditions, Flood Response, and Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-35, January.
    21. Andrew C. Ross & Raymond G. Najjar, 2019. "Evaluation of methods for selecting climate models to simulate future hydrological change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 407-428, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07361-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.