IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i12d10.1007_s11069-025-07359-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk evaluation of rockfall hazard in the tunnel portals of western mountain railway tunnels based on the improved G1–EWM–UMT model

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Dang

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)

  • Li Gong

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University
    School of Energy and Power Engineering, Gansu Minzu Normal University)

  • Chunling Jin

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)

  • Jun Qin

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)

  • Tengteng Yang

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)

  • Zhiyuan Jia

    (Gansu Water Resources and Hydropower Survey Design and Research Institute Limited Liability Company)

Abstract

To avoid the impact of rockfall on railroad safety, it is crucial to accurately predict the risk level of rockfall hazard in advance for the safe construction, operation, and maintenance of railroads. We take the western mountainous railroad tunnel portals as the research background and construct a western mountainous railroad tunnel portals rockfall hazard risk evaluation index system, including 15 core indexes and 6 alternative indexes. The unascertained measure theory (UMT) is chosen to evaluate the risk of rockfall hazard in tunnel portals. The improved G1 method and entropy weight method (EWM) are introduced to calculate the risk of rockfall hazard based on the confidence level criterion. Furthermore, the criterion is used to recognize the risk level of a rockfall hazard. Ten typical tunnel portals of a railroad in the west are selected to validate engineering examples, and the evaluation results of the improved G1–EWM–UMT model are compared with those of the TOPSIS model [the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS)] and the actual rockfall situation in the project. The comparison results show that improved G1–EWM–UMT model has 90% accuracy of rockfall risk evaluation results with actual rockfall grade, which is 30% and 20% higher than the accuracy of TOPSIS model and extension cloud model, respectively. This study has certain application value and engineering significance, which provides a theoretical basis and technical reference to design the rockfall protection structure of western mountainous tunnels such as the Sichuan–Tibet railway under similar engineering geological conditions and proves the operability and applicability of the evaluation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Dang & Li Gong & Chunling Jin & Jun Qin & Tengteng Yang & Zhiyuan Jia, 2025. "Risk evaluation of rockfall hazard in the tunnel portals of western mountain railway tunnels based on the improved G1–EWM–UMT model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(12), pages 14373-14398, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07359-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07359-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07359-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07359-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07359-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.