IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i11d10.1007_s11069-025-07289-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of Morris and GLUE methods for improving massflow-based debris flow simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Haibo Yang

    (Zhengzhou University
    State Key Laboratory of Tunnel Boring Machine and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance)

  • Jiaqi Huang

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Xinyi Liu

    (POWERCHINA GUIYANG Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Peng Xu

    (POWERCHINA GUIYANG Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Bo Yu

    (POWERCHINA GUIYANG Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Jinjun Guo

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Junhua Li

    (Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research)

  • Yuhang Zhou

    (Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research)

  • Xiaosong Shu

    (Zhengzhou University
    State Key Laboratory of Tunnel Boring Machine and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance)

Abstract

Debris flow is a common geologic hazard in mountainous areas. It is crucial to simulate its initiation, flow, and accumulation efficiently and accurately for disaster prevention and control. Parameter determination in simulations is quite subjective. To address this issue, the paper presents a simulation approach using the Morris and GLUE methods. The Morris sensitivity analysis is used to identify the sensitive parameters of the Massflow model. The GLUE method is used to calibrate the sensitive parameters and determine the optimal parameter set. Finally, the determined parameter set is employed to simulate the debris flow in Massflow. To validate the effectiveness of this method, Huangyang gully is selected as the case study. The Results show that (1) Rainfall is the most significant factor affecting Massflow simulation results, followed by the channel bed roughness coefficient. (2) The calibrated parameter set improves simulation accuracy from 64 to 76.22%. (3) As the rainfall probabilities decrease, the debris flow accumulation area expands significantly. The largest increase occurs when the area grows from 30,712 m2 for the AEP of P = 2% to 46,272 m2 for the AEP of P = 1%, a 22.7% increase. The simulation results show that the debris flow simulation method based on Morris and GLUE significantly enhances model accuracy. It provides technical support and a scientific foundation for debris flow disaster simulation and prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Haibo Yang & Jiaqi Huang & Xinyi Liu & Peng Xu & Bo Yu & Jinjun Guo & Junhua Li & Yuhang Zhou & Xiaosong Shu, 2025. "Integration of Morris and GLUE methods for improving massflow-based debris flow simulation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(11), pages 12589-12612, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07289-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07289-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07289-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07289-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07289-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.