IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i10d10.1007_s11069-025-07270-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated framework for wildfire emergency response and post-fire debris flow prediction: a case study from the wildfire event on 20 April 2021 in Mianning, Sichuan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Tang

    (Sichuan Academy of Safety Science and Technology
    Major Hazard Measurement and Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province)

  • Yuting Luo

    (Sichuan Academy of Safety Science and Technology
    Sichuan Anxin Kechuang Technology Co., Ltd.
    Major Hazard Measurement and Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province)

  • Lijuan Wang

    (Sichuan Academy of Safety Science and Technology
    Major Hazard Measurement and Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province)

  • Ming Chen

    (Chengdu University of Technology)

Abstract

Wildfires in forests pose a growing threat to ecosystems, human security and infrastructure. Wildfires can increase surface runoff and erosion processes under short-term intense rainfall, which can transport large amounts of solid material downstream to form debris flows in mountainous areas. To improve the speed of wildfire emergency response and reduce the risk of post-fire debris flows to residents and infrastructure in impacted areas, it is critical to rapidly and accurately identify wildfire dynamics, assess burn severity, and predict debris flows following a wildfire. Based on multi-source data and numerical modeling, we proposed an integrated framework for wildfire emergency response that enables pre-disaster, active-disaster, and post-disaster emergency management. First, we identified the distribution of wildfire rescue elements and wildfire spread dynamics based on high-resolution remote sensing and time-series brightness temperature data. Subsequently, we evaluated the burn severity of the 2021 Mianning wildfire based on the difference in normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Finally, we proposed a susceptibility model to evaluate the occurrence probability of debris flows in the burned mountains, which considered five influence factors: percentage of area with high and moderate severity burns in the catchment, sediment supply length ratio along the main channel, gradient of the main channel, catchment area, and mean slope of the burning zone. Moreover, we predicted the movement processes and hazard ranges of post-fire debris flows under the rainfall scenario of a 100 year return period using the OpenLISEM software. We observed that the total area of the burned area was 11.8 km2, and the high, medium and low burned severity areas accounted for 35.7%, 50.8% and 12.2%, respectively. We predicted that 53.6% of the catchments were characterized as being of moderate or higher debris flow susceptibility. A positive correlation was found between the intensity of post-fire debris flow activity and the burn severity of the catchment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Tang & Yuting Luo & Lijuan Wang & Ming Chen, 2025. "An integrated framework for wildfire emergency response and post-fire debris flow prediction: a case study from the wildfire event on 20 April 2021 in Mianning, Sichuan, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(10), pages 11997-12024, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07270-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07270-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07270-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07270-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07270-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.