Author
Listed:
- Siyang Zhai
(East China University of Technology
East China University of Technology)
- Yue Sun
(East China University of Technology
East China University of Technology)
- Jiantao Lei
(Jiangxi Mineral Resources Guarantee and Service Center)
- Chongjian Shao
(East China University of Technology
East China University of Technology)
Abstract
Machine learning models are extensively employed in landslide susceptibility evaluation, where the selection of non-landslide samples significantly impacts model performance. Traditional methods for non-landslide sample selection often yield inaccurate landslide susceptibility maps due to limitations in spatial representativeness and sample reliability. In this study, an improved information quantity method (IIQM) was proposed to evaluate landslide susceptibility in Yongfeng, South China. Specifically, non-landslide samples were randomly generated in areas with very low and low susceptibility, at least 1,200 m away from any other non-landslide sample. Eight influential factors were selected and analyzed, including slope, elevation, drainage networks, NDVI, roads, land-use types, lithology, and faults. Sample sets of historical landslides and non-landslides derived from the random selection method (RSM), information quantity method (IQM), and IIQM were divided into training and validation sets with a 4:1 ratio. Landslide susceptibility maps were generated using information quantity-logistic regression and respective training sets. The performance of the landslide susceptibility models was evaluated via specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC). Results demonstrated that IIQM-based models outperformed RSM and IQM, achieving a median AUC of 0.87 and an average AUC of 0.88, compared to RSM (median AUC of 0.68 and average AUC of 0.64) and IQM (median AUC of 0.86 and average AUC of 0.85). The IIQM effectively mitigates the inclusion of false non-landslides and improves model generalization, offering a robust framework for non-landslide selection in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessments. Also, proximity to roads (0–200 m, information value = 1.04) and lithology (hard-soft integrated stones, InV = 0.54) were identified as dominant contributors to landslide susceptibility in Yongfeng. These findings provide valuable insights into the selection of non-landslide samples, particularly within the context of information quantity-logistic regression and other machine learning models, and may also provide scientific reference for the regional landslide prevention.
Suggested Citation
Siyang Zhai & Yue Sun & Jiantao Lei & Chongjian Shao, 2025.
"An improved information quantity method for non-landslide selection to enhance landslide susceptibility evaluation: a case study in Yongfeng, South China,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(10), pages 11773-11797, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07261-9
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07261-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07261-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.