IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i10d10.1007_s11069-025-07257-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the household level perception and adaptation strategies to flood risk in informal settlements of Yamuna floodplain in Delhi

Author

Listed:
  • Shilpi Sachdeva

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

  • Praveen Kumar

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

Abstract

Understanding public risk perceptions and local coping and adaptation practices towards climate extremes can help establish effective policies towards disaster risk governance. Determining the local coping and adaptation strategies can also reveal the community’s preparedness to floods. This approach brings a bottom-up perspective to the policies, which can be tailored to the specific needs of local communities. This paper assessed perception, factors influencing the perception, and adaptation strategies from flood-affected informal settlements in Delhi. The development of mega projects and encroachments on the floodplain region in Delhi have increased the risk and vulnerability of the city to floods. The study presents the findings from the flood-prone areas of Delhi, focusing on contrasting risk profiles of formal and informal settlements. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, 140 households in three informal and two formal settlements were surveyed on their past experiences with floods, causes, impacts of floods, their perception of flood risk in their settlements, the coping and adaptation strategies they have been following over the years to mitigate the flood risk, the support they receive from various institutions and their effectiveness. The perceptions of risk were assessed using the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 6th assessment risk framework and were quantified to compare the perceived risk between formal and informal settlements. The results of the assessment show that informal settlements perceive a high flood risk compared to formal settlements, which is significantly shaped by demographic factors of age, education and assets. The results also revealed weak social bonds, institutional fragmentation, a mixed perception of early warning systems and a major focus on evacuation and temporary relocation rather than on preparedness measures such as elevating and building flood-resistant houses. We recommend collaboration between the Government, NGOs and communities, improving flood-resistant infrastructure such as expanding the capacity of drainage systems, coupled with social interventions such as training and education of informal dwellers, livelihood diversification, involvement of communities in the process, training and capacity building of stakeholders and setting-up context specific early warning system.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilpi Sachdeva & Praveen Kumar, 2025. "Assessing the household level perception and adaptation strategies to flood risk in informal settlements of Yamuna floodplain in Delhi," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(10), pages 11695-11729, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07257-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07257-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07257-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07257-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wim Kellens & Ruud Zaalberg & Tijs Neutens & Wouter Vanneuville & Philippe De Maeyer, 2011. "An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1055-1068, July.
    2. Mingshun Zhang & Yaguang Yang & Huanhuan Li & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2020. "Measuring Urban Resilience to Climate Change in Three Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Felician Andrew Kitole & Temitope O. Ojo & Chijioke U. Emenike & Nolwazi Z. Khumalo & Khalid M. Elhindi & Hazem S. Kassem, 2024. "The Impact of Poor Waste Management on Public Health Initiatives in Shanty Towns in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Theresa Garvin, 2001. "Analytical Paradigms: The Epistemological Distances between Scientists, Policy Makers, and the Public," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 443-456, June.
    5. Ming‐Chou Ho & Daigee Shaw & Shuyeu Lin & Yao‐Chu Chiu, 2008. "How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 635-643, June.
    6. Fariborz Zelli & Harro van Asselt, 2013. "Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Ewa Lechowska, 2018. "What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1341-1366, December.
    8. Justin Farrell, 2016. "Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 370-374, April.
    9. Susan Cutter, 2016. "The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 741-758, January.
    10. Anne-Maree Dowd & Nadine Marshall & Aysha Fleming & Emma Jakku & Estelle Gaillard & Mark Howden, 2014. "The role of networks in transforming Australian agriculture," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 558-563, July.
    11. Elisabete Figueiredo & Sandra Valente & Celeste Coelho & Luísa Pinho, 2009. "Coping with risk: analysis on the importance of integrating social perceptions on flood risk into management mechanisms -- the case of the municipality of Águeda, Portugal," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 581-602, July.
    12. Wim Kellens & Teun Terpstra & Philippe De Maeyer, 2013. "Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 24-49, January.
    13. E. Rollason & L. J. Bracken & R. J. Hardy & A. R. G. Large, 2018. "Rethinking flood risk communication," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1665-1686, July.
    14. Steve Rayner & Robin Cantor, 1987. "How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 3-9, March.
    15. P. Bubeck & W. J. W. Botzen & J. C. J. H. Aerts, 2012. "A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1481-1495, September.
    16. Emem O. Anwana & Oluwatobi Mary Owojori, 2023. "Analysis of Flooding Vulnerability in Informal Settlements Literature: Mapping and Research Agenda," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ewa Lechowska, 2022. "Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2343-2378, April.
    2. Md Omar Faruk & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2023. "The Determinants of Farmers’ Perceived Flood Risk and Their Flood Adaptation Assessments: A Study in a Char-Land Area of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Ken Hidaka & Mirai Ikegai & Satoki Masuda, 2024. "Regression modeling of subjective probability of river inundation with epistemic uncertainty: a short-term panel data analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(7), pages 6343-6375, May.
    4. Rianne van Duinen & Tatiana Filatova & Peter Geurts & Anne van der Veen, 2015. "Empirical Analysis of Farmers' Drought Risk Perception: Objective Factors, Personal Circumstances, and Social Influence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 741-755, April.
    5. Eoin O'Neill & Finbarr Brereton & Harutyun Shahumyan & J. Peter Clinch, 2016. "The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2158-2186, November.
    6. Yi Ge & Guangfei Yang & Xiaotao Wang & Wen Dou & Xueer Lu & Jie Mao, 2021. "Understanding risk perception from floods: a case study from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 3119-3140, February.
    7. Cristóbal De La Maza & Alex Davis & Cleotilde Gonzalez & Inês Azevedo, 2019. "Understanding Cumulative Risk Perception from Judgments and Choices: An Application to Flood Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 488-504, February.
    8. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal, 2024. "Psychological distancing and floods risk perception relating to climate change in flood-prone Bait communities of Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 12939-12970, May.
    9. Binh, Phung Thanh & Zhu, Xueqin & Groeneveld, Rolf A. & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2020. "Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Farman Ullah & Shahab E. Saqib & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad & Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah, 2020. "Flood risk perception and its determinants among rural households in two communities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 225-247, October.
    11. Mutlu, Asli & Roy, Debraj & Filatova, Tatiana, 2023. "Capitalized value of evolving flood risks discount and nature-based solution premiums on property prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Ming Zhong & Lu Xiao & Qian Zhang & Tao Jiang, 2021. "Risk Perception, Risk Communication, and Mitigation Actions of Flash Floods: Results from a Survey in Three Types of Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0186455 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina & Antonietta Bardi & Fabio A. Madau, 2025. "Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Primary Sector in Floodplains: A Study of Sardinia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Daniela Knuth & Doris Kehl & Lynn Hulse & Silke Schmidt, 2014. "Risk Perception, Experience, and Objective Risk: A Cross‐National Study with European Emergency Survivors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1286-1298, July.
    16. Muditha Karunarathna & Wasantha Athukorala, 2018. "The Determinants Of Investment On Floods Mitigation Activities: An Empirical Investigation In Sri Lanka," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 3(3), pages 37-59, December.
    17. Wim Kellens & Teun Terpstra & Philippe De Maeyer, 2013. "Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 24-49, January.
    18. James R. Meldrum & Patricia A. Champ & Hannah Brenkert‐Smith & Travis Warziniack & Christopher M. Barth & Lilia C. Falk, 2015. "Understanding Gaps Between the Risk Perceptions of Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) Residents and Wildfire Professionals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(9), pages 1746-1761, September.
    19. Tuğçe Anılan & Selahattin Bayram & Mahmut Cenk Sayıl & Osman Yüksek, 2024. "Statistical analysis of flood risk perception: a case study for Eastern Black Sea Basin, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8743-8760, July.
    20. Julie L. Demuth, 2018. "Explicating Experience: Development of a Valid Scale of Past Hazard Experience for Tornadoes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1921-1943, September.
    21. Ewa Lechowska, 2018. "What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1341-1366, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07257-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.