IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i6d10.1007_s11069-024-06404-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of historical megathrust earthquake ruptures in Central Chile using logic tree analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Javiera San Martín

    (University of Concepcion
    Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (IFOP))

  • Ignacia Calisto

    (University of Concepcion)

  • Jorge Quezada

    (Universidad de Concepción)

  • Daniel Stewart

    (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso)

  • Lisa Ely

    (Central Washington University)

  • Rodrigo Cifuentes-Lobos

    (University of Concepcion)

  • Marcos Moreno

    (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)

Abstract

Characterizing the spatial distribution of ruptures from historical and recent earthquakes is key to understanding the seismic cycle of large earthquakes in subduction zones, and thus to assessing the potential risks associated with future earthquakes. Central Chile (35 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S–38 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S) has been repeatedly affected by large earthquakes, such as the 2010 Maule (Mw 8.8) and the 1835 earthquakes witnessed by Robert Fitzroy (HMS Beagle captain). Here, we identify the rupture pattern and tsunami propagation of the 1751, 1835, and 2010 mega-earthquakes, events that overlapped in central Chile, by compiling historical records and applying robust statistical tools. We used an adaptation of a logic tree methodology to generate random sources of slip distribution for each event, constrained by tsunami and vertical deformation data. We find that the three events studied have different slip peaks. The 1751 earthquake has the largest slip with a maximum patch of $$\sim$$ ∼ 26 m, while the 2010 and 1835 earthquakes reach slips of $$\sim$$ ∼ 16 m and $$\sim$$ ∼ 10 m, respectively. Our results show that a part of the margin between 36 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S and 37 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S was consistently affected by large earthquakes, but with different slip and depth. The shallower depths of the megathrust north of 36 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S accumulated energy for at least 300 years, which was released by the 2010 earthquake. Our results provide important constraint for rupture patterns and spatial relationships between historical and recent earthquakes, thus extending the time scale for seismic slip distribution analyses over multiple cycles and contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of seismic hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Javiera San Martín & Ignacia Calisto & Jorge Quezada & Daniel Stewart & Lisa Ely & Rodrigo Cifuentes-Lobos & Marcos Moreno, 2024. "Characterization of historical megathrust earthquake ruptures in Central Chile using logic tree analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(6), pages 5411-5427, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06404-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06404-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06404-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06404-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06404-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.