IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i1d10.1007_s11069-023-06189-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution law of wind-sand flow field of multi-row reed sand barriers and optimal spacing

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanfeng An

    (Shihezi University)

  • Jianjun Cheng

    (Shihezi University)

  • Lusheng Ding

    (Xinjiang Railway Survey and Design Institute Co.)

  • Boyu Chen

    (Shihezi University)

  • Li Gao

    (Shihezi University)

  • Jia Lei

    (Shihezi University)

  • Benteng Ma

    (Shihezi University)

  • Zhipeng Zhen

    (Shihezi University)

Abstract

The multi-row sand barriers have been widely concerned in the road sand prevention project because of its high effective wind and sand prevention impact. The spacing between sand barriers is the primary issue to be resolved in the arrangement of multi-row sand barriers. This study considered the reed sand barrier protection project of Xinjiang segment of Golmud–Korla railway as the research object, revealed the evolution characteristics of flow field and distribution laws of sand accumulation under the control of three-row sand barriers spacing by field monitoring, wind tunnel test and numerical simulation, and the optimal spacing of three-row reed sand barriers was explored by Design Exploration optimization analysis method. The results indicated the flow field presented a typically superimposed morphology of deceleration zones, acceleration zones, and recovery zones when airflow passed through the reed sand barrier. There was no deceleration zone ahead the second-row and third-row sand barriers before optimization. The flow field distribution was complete and each-row sand barrier can have a synergistic role in wind and sand prevention after optimization. The optimal spacing between three-row sand barriers decreased as wind velocity increased. The optimal spacing between three-row sand barriers corresponding to 10 m/s, 15 m/s and 20 m/s wind velocity was 25.5 m, 24 m and 20 m, respectively. The sand-blocking rates of corresponding reed sand barriers were 84.53%, 64.42% and 47.51%, which were 8.54%, 20.77% and 0.78% higher than before optimization, respectively. Therefore, it was suggested that the spacing of three-row reed sand barriers in the investigation area should be 20 ~ 25 m in order to make each-row sand barriers to play a role.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanfeng An & Jianjun Cheng & Lusheng Ding & Boyu Chen & Li Gao & Jia Lei & Benteng Ma & Zhipeng Zhen, 2024. "Evolution law of wind-sand flow field of multi-row reed sand barriers and optimal spacing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(1), pages 197-218, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06189-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06189-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06189-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06189-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06189-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.