IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v114y2022i1d10.1007_s11069-022-05407-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practices in disaster mitigation in the case of the 2015 Typhoon Koppu debris flows in Nueva Ecija, Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca V. Llanes

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Rodrigo Eco

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines
    University of the Philippines)

  • Tatum Miko Herrero

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Jo Brianne Louise Briones

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines
    University of the Philippines Diliman)

  • Carmille Marie Escape

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Jolly Joyce Sulapas

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Jan Albert Macario Galang

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines
    Geoscience Division, Mines and Geosciences Bureau – MIMAROPA)

  • Iris Jill Ortiz

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Jasmine May Sabado

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines
    Development Academy of the Philippines)

  • Alfredo Mahar Francisco Lagmay

    (University of the Philippines Diliman
    University of the Philippines)

  • Kelvin Rodolfo

    (University of Illinois at Chicago)

Abstract

In October 2015, heavy rains brought by Typhoon Koppu generated landslides and debris flows in the municipalities of Bongabon, Laur, and Gabaldon in Nueva Ecija province. Satellite images and clusters of landslides show that most of the rain fell in the Sierra Madre mountains in Nueva Ecija and Aurora provinces. Landslides of rock, soil, and debris then converged in the mountain stream networks where they were remobilized into debris flows that destroyed numerous houses and structures. Approximately 42 million cubic meters of materials were mobilized into debris flows. Accurate forecasts enabled the municipal governments to warn residents to prepare for flooding and landslides. The debris flows occurred during the day, which may have helped to prevent deaths, unlike the 2004 Aurora debris flows which occurred at night, or the 2012 New Bataan disaster that happened very early in the morning. Here, we explain why the Typhoon Koppu debris flows caused no casualties due to mitigation mechanisms that were in place. We feature the people-centered early-warning system embedded in the Pre-Disaster Risk Assessment protocol of the Office of Civil Defense after the 2004 and 2012 debris flow disasters killed 1440 people.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca V. Llanes & Rodrigo Eco & Tatum Miko Herrero & Jo Brianne Louise Briones & Carmille Marie Escape & Jolly Joyce Sulapas & Jan Albert Macario Galang & Iris Jill Ortiz & Jasmine May Sabado & Al, 2022. "Practices in disaster mitigation in the case of the 2015 Typhoon Koppu debris flows in Nueva Ecija, Philippines," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 665-690, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05407-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05407-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05407-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05407-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05407-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.