IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minsoc/v24y2025i2d10.1007_s11299-025-00355-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strategic benefits of overconfidence

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel Page

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

Humans tend to exhibit systematically self-serving biases in their beliefs. They tend to think they are better, smarter, and nicer than they are, and attribute their success to themselves and their failure to external factors. They rationalise their errors and misdeeds while casting critical judgment on others’ missteps. This has often been interpreted as a sign that people are poor at forming judgments about themselves and the world. In contrast to this view, these belief distortions can be explained by the idea that evolution likely did not select for us to form accurate beliefs, but rather beliefs that can be useful. Overconfidence may actually be an adaptive feature of our cognition, providing advantages in various situations. At the same time, however, these individual advantages can generate collective costs. When overconfidence becomes widespread, it may lead to inefficient social equilibria-such as bargaining impasses, costly conflicts, or misguided leadership-where what is adaptive for individuals produces negative consequences at the group or societal level.

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel Page, 2025. "The strategic benefits of overconfidence," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 303-322, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00355-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11299-025-00355-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11299-025-00355-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11299-025-00355-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00355-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.