Author
Abstract
We report findings from a case study based on The Wisdom Project (TWP), a protocol designed to enhance reasoning and decision-making in complex real-world problem solving. Our case study is based on a seven-week workshop organized as online lessons focused on the thinking dispositions that support the development of skills associated with a particular meta-heuristic, wise reasoning. Lessons are two-hours long group video sessions where participants are introduced to the curriculum and engage in a set of evidence-based practices that promote embodied reframing. Participants select a project that provides the vehicle for embodied action and development. The projects, individually chosen by participants with the facilitator’s guidance, are dynamic personal or professional challenges. In this paper, the development of wise reasoning through TWP protocol is evaluated through open-ended interviews conducted at four intervals—before, during, immediately after, and six months after the program. Findings show that interviewees report progress in their chosen projects while also improving in the wise reasoning skillset. We argue that the positive outcomes stem from the embodied reframing achieved through enactive distancing, the recursive strategy of intentionally stepping back from immediate perceptions, emotions, and thoughts, to reason from an emotional state of aspiration. We discuss how these new concepts align with similar concepts from psychology, philosophy, economics, management, and contemporary wisdom research.
Suggested Citation
Iris Stammberger & Michael Mascolo, 2025.
"The wisdom project protocol: reasoning for wisdom in complex real-world enactive problem solving,"
Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 1061-1081, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00347-8
DOI: 10.1007/s11299-025-00347-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00347-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.