Author
Listed:
- Isabel Miguel
(Portucalense University, CINTESIS@RISE, CINTESIS.UPT)
- Micaela Pinho
(Portucalense University, REMIT, Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies
Portucalense University)
Abstract
Human values are a key component in understanding individuals’ choices. One such decision involves defining the criteria that should guide healthcare prioritization. The recent public health crisis (COVID-19) has underscored the insufficiency of healthcare resources in meeting growing demand. Preferences for allocating health resources are are deeply intertwined with ethical and moral judgments rooted in personal and societal values. Therefore, effective healthcare prioritization policies must consider the values of the population they serve. Drawing on Schwartz’s theory of basic human values, the present study aimed to identify the predominant human values among 1,148 Portuguese participants and examine their association withrespondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and their influence on support for three healthcare rationing approaches. A cluster analysis based on the higher-order dimensions of Schwartz’s value model identified four distinct groups: social focus, growth focus, strong social and personal focus, and weak social and personal focus. While egalitarianism emerged as the most widely accepted principle of justice in allocating scarce healthcare resources, participants with a strong social and personal focus prefered utilitarian and equity-based criteria more. Furthermore, positive associations were observed between utilitarian and equity approaches to healthcare rationing. Incorporating societalvalues into resource allocation decisions can can help establish priorities and guide more effective healthcare planning strategies.
Suggested Citation
Isabel Miguel & Micaela Pinho, 2025.
"The relationship between human values and support for distributive approaches in healthcare rationing : an exploratory study,"
Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 1025-1046, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00345-w
DOI: 10.1007/s11299-025-00345-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00345-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.