IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minsoc/v24y2025i2d10.1007_s11299-025-00341-0.html

Borrowing in competence attrition as adaptive bias

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Guercini

    (University of Florence, Department of Economics and Management)

  • Christian Lechner

    (LUISS University, Department of Business and Management)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to examine a specific form of competence attrition, borrowing, as heuristic solutions to a problem of partial loss of pre-existing organizational competences. In linguistics, language attrition is a recurring phenomenon that consists of the loss of proficiency in one’s native language due to interaction with and learning of a new language. Language attrition involves both systematic errors in the native language and alternative solutions offered by interaction with newly acquired language skills. Recently, a theory of competence attrition has been proposed as an extension of this phenomenon to organizational competences. The purpose of this article is to discuss how forms of competence attrition in organizations can be considered an adaptive solution, discussing the specific form of borrowing. After delving into the topic of borrowing, a case study of a company in the sneakers industry is proposed. The case highlights how resorting to borrowing represents a bias in standard skills that can be viewed positively by the organization as an adaptive solution that can be successful under specific conditions. Implications for both researchers and managers are formulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Guercini & Christian Lechner, 2025. "Borrowing in competence attrition as adaptive bias," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 323-340, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00341-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11299-025-00341-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11299-025-00341-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11299-025-00341-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2018. "The Bias Bias in Behavioral Economics," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 5(3-4), pages 303-336, December.
    2. de Holan Pablo Martin & Nelson Phillips, 2004. "Organizational forgetting as Strategy," Post-Print hal-02312934, HAL.
    3. Massimo Paoli & Andrea Prencipe, 2003. "Memory of the Organisation and Memories within the Organisation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 7(2), pages 145-162, June.
    4. Pamela R. Haunschild & Francisco Polidoro & David Chandler, 2015. "Organizational Oscillation Between Learning and Forgetting: The Dual Role of Serious Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1682-1701, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jochen Reb & Natalia Karelaia & Tomás Lejarraga, 2025. "Adaptive biases in the wild: Advancing our understanding of the nature of biases," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 187-192, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Tao, 2023. "Toward an understanding of innovation failure: The timing of failure experience," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Dirk Martignoni & Thomas Keil, 2021. "It did not work? Unlearn and try again—Unlearning success and failure beliefs in changing environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1057-1082, June.
    3. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & M. D. Christodoulou & M. Zottoli, 2024. "Uniqueness Bias: Why It Matters, How to Curb It," Papers 2408.07710, arXiv.org.
    4. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    5. Muhammad Usman & Ahmed Abdul Hameed & Shahid Manzoor, 2018. "Exploring the links between Ethical Leadership and Organizational Unlearning: A Case Study of a European Multinational Company," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(2), pages 28-54, June.
    6. Gruener, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2025. "The relevance of behavioral patterns when dealing with human-made climate change: Results from a survey with 1,510 researchers," SocArXiv uzycj_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Brighton, Henry, 2020. "Statistical foundations of ecological rationality," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 14, pages 1-32.
    8. Andrea Furlan & Ambra Galeazzo & Adriano Paggiaro, 2019. "Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees’ Problem Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 280-297, March.
    9. Xu, Shuling & Xie, Fulong & Hall, Nicholas G., 2025. "Sequencing with learning, forgetting and task similarity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(3), pages 400-415.
    10. Cacciatori, Eugenia, 2008. "Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1591-1601, October.
    11. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    12. Pitterle, Claudia, 2022. "Consumer behavior and decision making from officed- based doctors A systematic literature review," MPRA Paper 117730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Manisaligil, Alperen & Gölgeci, İsmail & Bakker, Arnold B. & Faruk Aysan, Ahmet & Babacan, Mehmet & Gür, Nurullah, 2023. "Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Oh, Chang Hoon & Shin, Jiyoung & Oetzel, Jennifer, 2021. "How does experience change firms' foreign investment decisions to non-market events?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    15. Bingham, Christopher B. & Kolev, Kalin D. & Haleblian, Jerayr (John) & Heimeriks, Koen, 2026. "Experience schedules: unpacking experience accumulation and its consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Wang, Xiaoyue & He, Zhixue & Chen, Ju & Zhang, Mingjuan & Shi, Lei, 2025. "Balancing peer preference and payoff pursuit in migration shapes social cohesion within unequal endowment populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Munt Juan Leandro & Parodi Salvador & Carrión Gonzalo & Bosch Miguel, 2025. "Mainstream, Strategic Interdependence and Economic Judgment: a methodological reconstruction from a Perceptive Perspective, 75 years after John Nash’s foundational contribution," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4822, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    18. Ruiz, Walter & Spinola, Danilo & Villalba, Maria Luisa, 2025. "Simulating Innovation Systems and STI Policy: An Agent-Based Perspective," CAFE Working Papers 32, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    19. Santiago Quintero Ramírez & Walter Lugo Ruiz Casta�eda & Jorge Robledo Vel�squez, 2017. "Representation of unlearning in the innovation systems: A proposal from agent-based modeling," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 33(145), pages 366-376.
    20. Arkadiusz Sieron, 2020. "Some Problems of Behavioral Economics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 336-362.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11299-025-00341-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.