Author
Listed:
- Mir Md Ashfaque Sumon
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
- Hyungju Kim
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
- Børge Rokseth
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
Abstract
A critical challenge in the safe operation of autonomous vessels is ensuring that control commands are executed accurately and promptly by both shore-side and onboard systems. In this paper, we build on a use case of an autonomous ship, where the control hierarchy includes Human Operators on the shoreside, along with the Ship Motion Controller, Power Management System, and Battery Management System, among other controllers on the shipside. Incorrect execution of control actions by these controllers can lead to hazardous situations of varying severity. This study aims to identify and analyze hazards related to these four controllers and provide insights into how inadequate control may occur and create hazardous situations with the controllers. Recently, STPA has emerged as the mainstream approach for identifying hazards resulting from control action failures. Therefore, this study applies the System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) method to explore how control actions of different controllers might fail, ensuring safe operation. A control structure hierarchy has been developed that identifies (1) control actions and (2) feedback signals between controllers based on their responsibilities. Using STPA, a total of 127 unsafe control actions are identified that could result in hazards. We classify the significance of Unsafe Control Actions based on hazard severity, operational mode, and suggest the level of attention each controller requires. The results offer a structured foundation for prioritizing safety–critical control actions in battery-powered autonomous ships, facilitating more effective risk mitigation strategies for designers, operators, and regulators.
Suggested Citation
Mir Md Ashfaque Sumon & Hyungju Kim & Børge Rokseth, 2025.
"Hazard analysis of autonomous vessel operation during the interaction and execution between remote operation centre controller and onboard controllers,"
Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-025-00214-2
DOI: 10.1186/s41072-025-00214-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-025-00214-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.