IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v111y2001i3d10.1023_a1012693710097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Generalization Problem

Author

Listed:
  • L. C. W. Dixon

    (University of Hertfordshire)

Abstract

The generalization problem considered in this paper assumes that a limited amount of input and output data from a system is available, and that from this information an estimate of the output produced by another input is required. The ideas arose in the study of neural networks, but apply equally to any approximation approach. The main result is that the type of neural network to be used for generalization should be determined by the prior knowledge about the nature of the output from the system. Without such information, either of two networks matching the training data is equally likely to be the better at estimating the output generated by the same system at a new input. Therefore, the search for an optimum generalization network for use on all problems is inappropriate. For both (0, 1) and accurate real outputs, it is shown that simple approximations exist that fit the data, so these will be equally likely to generalize better than more sophisticated networks, unless prior knowledge is available that excludes them. For noisy real outputs, it is shown that the standard least squares approach forces the neural network to approximate an incorrect process; an alternative approach is outlined, which again is much easier to learn and use.

Suggested Citation

  • L. C. W. Dixon, 2001. "On the Generalization Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 489-500, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:111:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1012693710097
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1012693710097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1012693710097
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1012693710097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:111:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1012693710097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.