IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joprea/v40y2023i4d10.1007_s12546-023-09320-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expected length of stay at residential aged care facilities in Australia: current and future

Author

Listed:
  • Jinhui Zhang

    (Macquarie University)

  • Yanlin Shi

    (Macquarie University)

  • Guogui Huang

    (Macquarie University)

Abstract

This study explores the changing patterns of the length of stay (LOS) at Australian residential aged care facilities during 2008–2018 and likely trends up to 2040. The expected LOS was estimated via the hazard function of exiting from such a facility and its heterogeneity by residents’ sociodemographic characteristics using an improved Cox regression model. Data were sourced from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. In-sample modelling results reveal that the estimated LOS differed by age (in general, shorter for older groups), marital status (longer for the widowed) and sex (longer for females). In addition, the estimated LOS increased slowly from 2008–2009 to 2016–2017 but declined steadily thereafter. Out-of-sample predictions suggest that the declining trend of the estimated LOS will continue until 2040 and that the longest LOS (approximately 37 months) will be observed among widowed females aged 50–79 years. Relative uncertainty measures are provided. The results portray the current changing landscape and the future trend of residential aged care use in Australia, which can inform the development of optimised residential aged care policies to support ageing Australians more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinhui Zhang & Yanlin Shi & Guogui Huang, 2023. "Expected length of stay at residential aged care facilities in Australia: current and future," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:40:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12546-023-09320-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12546-023-09320-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12546-023-09320-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12546-023-09320-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song Yang & Ross Prentice, 2005. "Semiparametric analysis of short-term and long-term hazard ratios with two-sample survival data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(1), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Song Yang & Ross Prentice, 2010. "Improved Logrank-Type Tests for Survival Data Using Adaptive Weights," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 30-38, March.
    3. Song Yang & Yichuan Zhao, 2012. "Checking the Short-Term and Long-Term Hazard Ratio Model for Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 39(3), pages 554-567, September.
    4. James Raymer & Yanlin Shi & Qing Guan & Bernard Baffour & Tom Wilson, 2018. "The Sources and Diversity of Immigrant Population Change in Australia, 1981–2011," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(5), pages 1777-1802, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yukun Liu & Guosheng Yin, 2017. "Partitioned log-rank tests for the overall homogeneity of hazard rate functions," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 400-425, July.
    2. Grzegorz Wyłupek, 2021. "A permutation test for the two-sample right-censored model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(5), pages 1037-1061, October.
    3. Erica Brittain & Dean Follmann & Song Yang, 2008. "Dynamic Comparison of Kaplan–Meier Proportions: Monitoring a Randomized Clinical Trial with a Long-Term Binary Endpoint," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 189-197, March.
    4. Xiaodong Luo & Hui Quan, 2020. "Some Meaningful Weighted Log-Rank and Weighted Win Loss Statistics," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 216-224, July.
    5. Kathrin Möllenhoff & Achim Tresch, 2023. "Investigating non-inferiority or equivalence in time-to-event data under non-proportional hazards," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 483-507, July.
    6. Zhishan Ma & Susu Zhang & Sidong Zhao, 2021. "Study on the Spatial Pattern of Migration Population in Egypt and Its Flow Field Characteristics from the Perspective of “Source-Flow-Sink”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Yu-Mei Chang & Chun-Shu Chen & Pao-Sheng Shen, 2012. "A jackknife-based versatile test for two-sample problems with right-censored data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 267-277, April.
    8. Lu Tian & Haoda Fu & Stephen J. Ruberg & Hajime Uno & Lee†Jen Wei, 2018. "Efficiency of two sample tests via the restricted mean survival time for analyzing event time observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 694-702, June.
    9. Nieto-Barajas, Luis E., 2014. "Bayesian semiparametric analysis of short- and long-term hazard ratios with covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 477-490.
    10. Jiajia Zhang & Timothy Hanson & Haiming Zhou, 2019. "Bayes factors for choosing among six common survival models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 361-379, April.
    11. Majid Asadi & Karthik Devarajan & Nader Ebrahimi & Ehsan Soofi & Lauren Spirko‐Burns, 2022. "Elaboration Models with Symmetric Information Divergence," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 499-524, December.
    12. Tamara Fernández & Nicolás Rivera, 2021. "A reproducing kernel Hilbert space log‐rank test for the two‐sample problem," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1384-1432, December.
    13. Andrea Arfè & Brian Alexander & Lorenzo Trippa, 2021. "Optimality of testing procedures for survival data in the nonproportional hazards setting," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 587-598, June.
    14. Seung-Hwan Lee, 2021. "Weighted Log-Rank Statistics for Accelerated Failure Time Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, May.
    15. Yuan Mengdie & Diao Guoqing, 2014. "Semiparametric Odds Rate Model for Modeling Short-Term and Long-Term Effects with Application to a Breast Cancer Genetic Study," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Dagmara Laukova & Aude Bernard & Toan Nguyen & Thomas Sigler, 2022. "The role of visa class in the location choices of immigrants in Australia at the regional and neighbourhood scales," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 201-231, June.
    17. Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2020. "A Non‐Proportional Hazards Model with Hazard Ratio Functions Free from Covariate Values," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 715-727, December.
    18. Deborah Plana & Geoffrey Fell & Brian M. Alexander & Adam C. Palmer & Peter K. Sorger, 2022. "Cancer patient survival can be parametrized to improve trial precision and reveal time-dependent therapeutic effects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Marc Buyse & Everardo D. Saad & Tomasz Burzykowski & Julien Péron, 2020. "Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-oncology," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 83-103, July.
    20. Jimmy T. Efird, 2023. "The Inverse Log-Rank Test: A Versatile Procedure for Late Separating Survival Curves," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:40:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12546-023-09320-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.