IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i7d10.1007_s10845-024-02482-4.html

Reliability-improved machine learning model using knowledge-embedded learning approach for smart manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Farzam Farbiz

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR))

  • Saurabh Aggarwal

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR))

  • Tomasz Karol Maszczyk

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR))

  • Mohamed Salahuddin Habibullah

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR))

  • Brahim Hamadicharef

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR))

Abstract

Machine learning models play a crucial role in smart manufacturing by revolutionizing industrial automation so as to boost productivity and product quality. However, the reliability of these models often faces challenges from factors such as data drift, concept drift, adversarial attacks, and increasing model complexity. In addressing these challenges, this paper proposes a novel approach called Reliability Improved Machine Learning (RIML), which leverages on prior knowledge by incorporating it into the machine learning pipeline through a secondary output that is easily verifiable and assessable within the application domain. Built upon the Knowledge-embedded Machine Learning (KML) framework, RIML differs from conventional strategies by modifying the model’s architecture. In its implementation, additional layers were introduced, specifically designed to identify and discard misclassified cases to improve the model’s reliability. RIML’s efficacy was successfully demonstrated through a simulated dataset and three real use-case studies, namely, a general walk/run scenario, an industry-related case using metro railway dataset, and a smart manufacturing application on gas detection. The promising results highlighted RIML’s ability to significantly reduce misclassifications, thereby enhancing model reliability in diverse real-world scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzam Farbiz & Saurabh Aggarwal & Tomasz Karol Maszczyk & Mohamed Salahuddin Habibullah & Brahim Hamadicharef, 2025. "Reliability-improved machine learning model using knowledge-embedded learning approach for smart manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(7), pages 4941-4962, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02482-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-024-02482-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-024-02482-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-024-02482-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farzam Farbiz & Mohd Salahuddin Habibullah & Brahim Hamadicharef & Tomasz Maszczyk & Saurabh Aggarwal, 2023. "Knowledge-embedded machine learning and its applications in smart manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2889-2906, October.
    2. Scheuren, Fritz, 2005. "Multiple Imputation: How It Began and Continues," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 315-319, November.
    3. Chongchong Xu & Zhicheng Liao & Chaojie Li & Xiaojun Zhou & Renyou Xie, 2022. "Review on Interpretable Machine Learning in Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Alexander A Huang & Samuel Y Huang, 2023. "Increasing transparency in machine learning through bootstrap simulation and shapely additive explanations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Yang, Guangfei & Li, Xianneng & Wang, Jianliang & Lian, Lian & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "Modeling oil production based on symbolic regression," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 48-61.
    6. Hauke Jan & Kossowski Tomasz, 2011. "Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 87-93, June.
    7. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Zhang, Zhechen & Luo, Hanbin & Liu, Jiajing, 2025. "Incorporation of knowledge and data-driven models applied in shield tunneling: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
    3. Alex Bara & Pierre LeRoux, 2018. "Technology, Financial Innovations and Bank Behavior in a Low Income Country," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 221-234.
    4. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Pan, Yongjun & Sun, Yu & Li, Zhixiong & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to estimate suspension parameters for performance degradation assessment using accurate dynamic simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Pan, Yue & Ou, Shenwei & Zhang, Limao & Zhang, Wenjing & Wu, Xianguo & Li, Heng, 2019. "Modeling risks in dependent systems: A Copula-Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 416-431.
    7. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Oscar Claveria & Enric Monte & Salvador Torra, 2017. "A new approach for the quantification of qualitative measures of economic expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2685-2706, November.
    9. Phan, Hieu Chi & Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra & Bui, Nang Duc, 2023. "Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Nancy, Jane Y. & Khanna, Nehemiah H. & Arputharaj, Kannan, 2017. "Imputing missing values in unevenly spaced clinical time series data to build an effective temporal classification framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-79.
    12. Liu, Jiale & Wang, Huan, 2024. "A brain-inspired energy-efficient Wide Spiking Residual Attention Framework for intelligent fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Adriana Gómez-Cabrera & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Laura Montalban-Domingo & Jose Luis Ponz-Tienda & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Identification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Rural Road Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Zhang, Dingyang & Zhang, Yiming & Li, Pei & Zhang, Shuyou, 2025. "Kernel Reinforcement Learning for sampling-efficient risk management of large-scale engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Yuan, Zixia & Xiong, Guojiang & Fu, Xiaofan & Mohamed, Ali Wagdy, 2023. "Improving fault tolerance in diagnosing power system failures with optimal hierarchical extreme learning machine," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    16. Díaz-Vallejo, Mauricio & Peña-Peniche, Alexander & Mota-Vargas, Claudio & Piña-Torres, Javier & Valencia-Rodríguez, Daniel & Rangel-Rivera, Coral E. & Gaviria-Hernández, Juliana & Rojas-Soto, Octavio, 2024. "Analyses of the variable selection using correlation methods: An approach to the importance of statistical inferences in the modelling process," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    17. Bouchra Zellou & Hassane Rahali, 2017. "Assessment of reduced-complexity landscape evolution model suitability to adequately simulate flood events in complex flow conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Judit Bar-Ilan & Mark Levene, 2015. "The hw-rank: an h-index variant for ranking web pages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2247-2253, March.
    19. Patrik Silva & Lin Li, 2020. "Urban Crime Occurrences in Association with Built Environment Characteristics: An African Case with Implications for Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Ma Zhong & Rong Xu & Xinyi Liao & Shuangli Zhang, 2019. "Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02482-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.