IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i7d10.1007_s10845-024-02467-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of different machine vision algorithms for tool wear measurement during machining

Author

Listed:
  • Mayur A. Makhesana

    (Nirma University)

  • Prashant J. Bagga

    (Nirma University)

  • Kaushik M. Patel

    (Nirma University)

  • Haresh D. Patel

    (Nirma University)

  • Aditya Balu

    (Iowa State University)

  • Navneet Khanna

    (Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, Institute of Infrastructure Technology, Research and Management)

Abstract

Automatic tool condition monitoring becomes crucial in metal cutting because tool wear impacts the final product’s quality. The optical microscope approach for assessing tool wear is offline, time-consuming, and subject to measurement error by humans. To accomplish this, the machine must be stopped, and the tool must be removed, which causes downtime. As a result, numerous research attempts have been made to develop robust systems for direct tool wear measurement during machining. Therefore, the proposed work focused on developing a direct tool condition monitoring system using machine vision to calculate tool wear parameters, specifically flank wear. The cutting tool insert images are collected using a machine vision setup equipped with an industrial camera, bi-telecentric lens, and a proper illumination system during the machining of AISI 4140 steel. The comparative analysis of image processing algorithms for tool wear measurement is proposed under the selected machining environment. The wear boundary is extracted using digital image processing tools such as image enhancement, image segmentation, image morphology operation, and edge detection. The wear amount on the tool insert is extracted and recorded using the Hough line transformation function and pixel scanning. The comparison of results revealed the measurement accuracy and repeatability of the proposed image processing algorithm with a maximum of 6.25% and minimum of 1.10% error compared to manual measurement. Hence, the proposed approach eliminates manual measurements and improves the machining productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayur A. Makhesana & Prashant J. Bagga & Kaushik M. Patel & Haresh D. Patel & Aditya Balu & Navneet Khanna, 2025. "Comparative analysis of different machine vision algorithms for tool wear measurement during machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(7), pages 4567-4591, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02467-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-024-02467-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-024-02467-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-024-02467-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02467-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.