IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i6d10.1007_s10845-024-02440-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocation of geometrical errors for developing precision measurement machine

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Lai

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Junfeng Liu

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Fulei Chen

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Zelong Li

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Chaoliang Guan

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Huang Li

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Chao Xu

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Hao Hu

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Yifan Dai

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Shanyong Chen

    (National University of Defense Technology
    Hu’nan Key Laboratory of Ultra-Precision Machining Technology)

  • Zhongxiang Dai

    (National University of Defense Technology)

Abstract

A high-precision measurement machine tool faces the challenge of correlating the overall motion accuracy with the components form and positional accuracy. This study presents an innovative method for addressing this issue in ultra-precision measuring machines. A geometric error model based on multibody theory, and a weight model are established to predict measurement results and correlate overall motion accuracy with individual component accuracy. To validate the model, a target overall motion accuracy of 100 nm is set and the all the individual components accuracy is calculated by the geometric error weights derived from the proposed model. By fabricating a critical component, the linear guideway, to meet specific individual accuracies and incorporating it in an ultra-precise measurement machine, the study demonstrates achieving the individual accuracies with the magnetorheological polishing. Finally, the overall motion accuracy is validated by a cross test among the designed machine, DUI profilometer, and Zygo interferometer. By measuring a same optical surface, the measurement results show the surface PV differences better than 100 nm. The results demonstrate the validation of the correlation between overall motion accuracy and component accuracy established by the method described in this paper. In conclusion, this study offers an accurate design solution for determining overall motion and individual accuracies, enabling high accuracy in intelligent manufacturing equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Lai & Junfeng Liu & Fulei Chen & Zelong Li & Chaoliang Guan & Huang Li & Chao Xu & Hao Hu & Yifan Dai & Shanyong Chen & Zhongxiang Dai, 2025. "Allocation of geometrical errors for developing precision measurement machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(6), pages 4105-4127, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02440-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-024-02440-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-024-02440-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-024-02440-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02440-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.