IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v14y2025i1d10.1186_s13731-025-00541-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing disruptive potential in the IT sector: a framework for evaluating company-to-company impact

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Rouhani Zeidanloo

    (Prague University of Economics and Business)

  • Miroslav Špaček

    (Prague University of Economics and Business)

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving IT industry, assessing a company’s potential to disrupt or be disrupted is vital for maintaining a competitive edge. This research introduces a novel framework designed to evaluate the disruptive potential among IT companies. Unlike traditional models that focus solely on predicting disruptive technologies, this framework employs a multi-dimensional approach, considering business model innovation, customer engagement, network effects, technological advancement, and strategic market positioning. The framework was developed through a comprehensive review of existing models and refined with insights from IT professionals. Its effectiveness was validated using three case studies: Apple’s disruption of Nokia, the competitive dynamics between Mondoo and Lacework, and Mondoo’s challenge to WIZ in the cybersecurity area. These case studies demonstrated the framework’s robustness in both historical and contemporary contexts. Additionally, the framework was further refined and validated through participant observation by the main author during his tenure as a cybersecurity engineer and consultant at Mondoo, a cybersecurity startup in Silicon Valley. This real-time, immersive engagement allowed the author to systematically observe the dynamics of disruptive innovation within the company, including its agile responses to technological changes, market penetration challenges, and customer-centric strategies. The use of qualitative data analysis tools, such as MAXQDA and ChatGPT, enabled the integration of these observations into the framework, enhancing its practical relevance and accuracy in assessing disruptive potential (80%).

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Rouhani Zeidanloo & Miroslav Špaček, 2025. "Assessing disruptive potential in the IT sector: a framework for evaluating company-to-company impact," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-64, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:14:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-025-00541-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-025-00541-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-025-00541-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-025-00541-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Park & Erin Leahey & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 138-144, January.
    2. ., 2024. "Innovations for development," Chapters, in: Transforming Poor Economies, chapter 10, pages 178-192, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 625-648, April.
    4. Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2018. "Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3015-3032, July.
    5. Minhao Xiang & Dian Fu & Kun Lv, 2023. "Identifying and Predicting Trends of Disruptive Technologies: An Empirical Study Based on Text Mining and Time Series Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Palmié, Maximilian & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 574-587.
    7. Mary Tripsas, 2008. "Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 79-97.
    8. Dotsika, Fefie & Watkins, Andrew, 2017. "Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 114-127.
    9. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    10. Kshetri, Nir, 2013. "Privacy and security issues in cloud computing: The role of institutions and institutional evolution," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 372-386.
    11. Till Gramberg & Thomas Bauernhansl & Andreas Eggert, 2024. "Disruptive Factors in Product Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Study in B2B Manufacturing for Sustainable Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Julian Marius Müller & Raphael Kunderer, 2019. "Ex-Ante Prediction of Disruptive Innovation: The Case of Battery Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Ran Li & Wangke Yu & Qianliang Huang & Qin Chen & Gianpaolo Di Bona, 2022. "A New Identify Disruptive Technologies Algorithm Based on Technology Develop Network," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-10, December.
    14. Gort, Michael & Klepper, Steven, 1982. "Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(367), pages 630-653, September.
    15. Lilyana Bardukova, 2023. "Navigating the Hospitality Horizon: Current Trends and Strategies for Customer Attraction and Retention in the Hotel Industry," Economics and computer science, Publishing house "Knowledge and business" Varna, issue 2, pages 88-103.
    16. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2023. "Data‐enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(4), pages 638-667, December.
    17. Klenner, Philipp & Hüsig, Stefan & Dowling, Michael, 2013. "Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—When are markets ready for disruptive innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 914-927.
    18. Christoffer Hansson & Bruno F. Abrantes, 2023. "Strategic Adaption (Capabilities) and the Responsiveness to COVID-19’s Business Environmental Threats," Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, in: Bruno F. Abrantes & Jesper Lind Madsen (ed.), Essentials on Dynamic Capabilities for a Contemporary World, pages 1-23, Springer.
    19. Preißner, Stephanie & Raasch, Christina & Schweisfurth, Tim, 2023. "When necessity is the mother of disruption: Users versus producers as sources of disruptive innovation," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 293964, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Hilda Bø Lyng & Eric Christian Brun, 2018. "Knowledge Transition: A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Transfer for Cross-Industry Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1-23, October.
    21. Adamuthe, Amol C. & Thampi, Gopakumaran T., 2019. "Technology forecasting: A case study of computational technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 181-189.
    22. Paul Strebel, 1987. "Organizing for innovation over an industry cycle," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 117-124, March.
    23. Agarwal, Rajshree & Gort, Michael, 1996. "The Evolution of Markets and Entry, Exit and Survival of Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 78(3), pages 489-498, August.
    24. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    25. Alina Behne & Jan Heinrich Beinke & Frank Teuteberg, 2021. "A Framework for Cross-Industry Innovation: Transferring Technologies between Industries," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-27, May.
    26. Clayton M. Christensen & Rory McDonald & Elizabeth J. Altman & Jonathan E. Palmer, 2018. "Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1043-1078, November.
    27. Weifeng Jia & Shuo Wang & Yongping Xie & Zifeng Chen & Kaixin Gong, 2022. "Disruptive technology identification of intelligent logistics robots in AIoT industry: Based on attributes and functions analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 557-568, May.
    28. Leonard F. S. Wang & Domenico Buccella, 2023. "The Timing of Technology Adoption in Network Industries," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 62(4), pages 367-392, June.
    29. Ashraf Mishrif & Asharul Khan, 2023. "Technology adoption as survival strategy for small and medium enterprises during COVID-19," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    30. Roy, Raja, 2018. "Role of relevant lead users of mainstream product in the emergence of disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 314-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio, Jerome L. & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2023. "Contextual factors of disruptive innovation: A systematic review and framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Minhao Xiang & Dian Fu & Kun Lv, 2023. "Identifying and Predicting Trends of Disruptive Technologies: An Empirical Study Based on Text Mining and Time Series Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Klenner, Philipp & Hüsig, Stefan & Dowling, Michael, 2013. "Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—When are markets ready for disruptive innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 914-927.
    4. Helveston, John P. & Wang, Yanmin & Karplus, Valerie J. & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2019. "Institutional complementarities: The origins of experimentation in China’s plug-in electric vehicle industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 206-222.
    5. Blume, Maximilian & Oberländer, Anna Maria & Röglinger, Maximilian & Rosemann, Michael & Wyrtki, Katrin, 2020. "Ex ante assessment of disruptive threats: Identifying relevant threats before one is disrupted," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Mahka Moeen & Rajshree Agarwal & Sonali K. Shah, 2020. "Building Industries by Building Knowledge: Uncertainty Reduction over Industry Milestones," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 218-244, September.
    7. Camerani, Roberto & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Fontana, Roberto, 2020. "It's never too late (to enter)… till it is! Firms’ entry and exit in the digital audio player industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Hoetker, Glenn & Agarwal, Rajshree, 2005. "Death Hurts, But It Isn't Fatal: The Postexit Diffusion of Knowledge Created by Innovative Companies," Working Papers 05-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    9. Andrés Felipe Martínez, 2006. "Determinantes de la supervivencia de empresas industriales en el área metropolitana de Cali 1994-2003," Ensayos Sobre Economía Regional (ESER) 2320, Banco de la República - Economía Regional.
    10. Rajshree Agarwal & Barry L. Bayus, 2002. "The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1024-1041, August.
    11. Baldwin, John R., 1999. "Un portrait des entrees et des sorties," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1999121f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    12. Filson, Darren, 2002. "Product and process innovations in the life cycle of an industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 97-112, September.
    13. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Silviano Esteve-Pérez & Fabio Pieri & Diego Rodriguez, 2018. "Age and productivity as determinants of firm survival over the industry life cycle," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 167-198, February.
    15. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Paola Giuri, 2000. "Industry Life Cycle and the Evolution of an Industry Network," LEM Papers Series 2000/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    16. Jian Tong, 2009. "Explaining The Shakeout Process: A ‘Successive Submarkets’ Model," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 950-975, April.
    17. Emin Dinlersoz & Glenn MacDonald, 2009. "The Industry Life-Cycle of the Size Distribution of Firms," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 12(4), pages 648-667, October.
    18. Uwe Cantner & Kristina Dreßler & Jens J. Krüger, 2006. "Firm survival in the German automobile industry," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 49-60, March.
    19. Jackie Krafft, 2004. "Shakeout in industrial dynamics: new developments, new puzzles," Chapters, in: John Foster & Werner Hölzl (ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics and Complex Systems, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Chang Jing & Hou Ke & Zhu Yangpeng, 2023. "Performance investment and price decisions of two‐sided platforms under multiple quality regulation strategies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2148-2158, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:14:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-025-00541-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.