Author
Listed:
- Ana Gutiérrez
(GIA, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Av. Gran Colombia
GIDITICS, Universidad EAFIT
Tepuy R+D Group. Artificial Intelligence Software Development)
- Jose Aguilar
(GIDITICS, Universidad EAFIT
CEMISID, Universidad de Los Andes
IMDEA Networks Institute
Tepuy R+D Group. Artificial Intelligence Software Development)
- Ana Ortega
(GIDITICS, Universidad EAFIT)
- Edwin Montoya
(GIDITICS, Universidad EAFIT
Tepuy R+D Group. Artificial Intelligence Software Development)
Abstract
Nowadays, we can express the experience we have lived with the products we use. Most of the time, we interact with brands and let our likes and dislikes be seen on digital platforms, either by interacting with social networks, filling out satisfaction surveys, or registering requests, complaints, and claims. To get the value of all available customer data of the companies, in this article, we propose to study the data from different sources using an autonomic cycle of data analysis tasks to define innovation problems in an organization. The tasks of the autonomic cycle are filter the customer comments from different sources (e.g., from social networks, PCCS (petitions, complaints, claims, suggestions) systems of organizations, etc.), obtain their keywords, and analyze the patterns of the users to answer the questions of the 5W methodology (what, who, where, when and why?), to define innovation problems. Finally, this article analyzes a case study of a fashion company using its PCCS system and comments of Twitter, to identify useful information. Part of the information discovered was the reasons for customer returns, merchandise delivery problems, shipment failures, failure to respond timely to customers, among other things. With this information, the autonomic cycle is able to define customer and organization-oriented innovation problems, to respond to these identified problems.
Suggested Citation
Ana Gutiérrez & Jose Aguilar & Ana Ortega & Edwin Montoya, 2025.
"Definition of innovation problems in organizations using data analysis tasks from hybrid sources: social networks and organizational databases,"
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:14:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-025-00536-2
DOI: 10.1186/s13731-025-00536-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:14:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-025-00536-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.