IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecin/v23y2025i3d10.1007_s10888-025-09702-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do social preferences explain health inequality aversion?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Robson

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Tim Doran

    (University of York)

  • Owen O’Donnell

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Tom Van Ourti

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

Impartial-spectator experiments find strong average health inequality aversion with much variation that is unexplained. We examine whether social preferences over own and others’ health can partly explain this variation. We conduct an online experiment, with a UK general public sample (n=903), in which participants allocate resources to determine health of hypothetical individuals. Randomly induced equality-efficiency trade-offs identify participant-level inequality aversion that is estimated with a random behavioural model. We elicit social preferences from choices between own health and another’s health, both when the participant is health advantaged and disadvantaged. We find that social preferences do partly explain the substantial variation in estimated health inequality aversion. Compassion from a position of health advantage is most closely correlated with inequality aversion, which is also associated with unselfishness and the convexity of social preferences. Our value judgements on fair health distribution appear related to concerns about those less healthy than us.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Robson & Tim Doran & Owen O’Donnell & Tom Van Ourti, 2025. "Do social preferences explain health inequality aversion?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(3), pages 933-956, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joecin:v:23:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10888-025-09702-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10888-025-09702-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10888-025-09702-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10888-025-09702-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joecin:v:23:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10888-025-09702-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.