IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v16y2025i5d10.1007_s13132-024-02475-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progress of G20 Nations on the 6th Sustainable Development Goal Under the Circular Economy Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Suárez Campoli

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Tatiana Kimura Kodama

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Marcelo Seido Nagano

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Heloisa Lee Burnquist

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

Clean water and sanitation are essential for public health, economic development, and environmental preservation, underscoring the importance of achieving the 6th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). Evaluating the progress of G20 nations towards this goal from a circular economy (CE) perspective provides critical insights into the efficiency and productivity of different countries in sustainable water management. This study aims to assess the efficiency and productivity of G20 countries in advancing towards the 6th SDG from a circular economy perspective between 2010 and 2019. We hypothesize that adopting circular economy practices can enhance the efficiency and productivity of countries in achieving the 6th SDG. This study employs data envelopment analysis-slack-based measure (DEA-SBM) to determine efficiency and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to measure productivity over time. Inputs considered were the population using at least essential drinking water services and renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, while outputs included wastewater treatment and water stress levels. The findings revealed heterogeneous performance between developed and emerging countries concerning progress towards the 6th SDG during the specified period. Efficient developed countries included Germany, Australia, and the UK, while efficient emerging nations were Saudi Arabia, Brazil, South Africa, and India. The results suggest that all countries, regardless of their current performance, have significant potential to enhance their efficiency by devising strategies aligned with sustainable development and environmental policies that resonate with CE principles. This potential for improvement should make all stakeholders feel included and part of the solution. Moreover, productivity gains were predominantly driven by efficiency improvements rather than technological advancements, highlighting the need to prioritize research and development of resource-efficient technologies to expedite the achievement of the 6th SDG. In the short term, a collaborative and multilateral effort is crucial, involving financial assistance, technology transfer, training, capacity building, public–private partnerships, policy development, awareness campaigns, and disaster and crisis response from developed to emerging countries. This emphasis on collaboration should make all stakeholders feel the importance of their involvement. Such efforts could significantly improve access, innovation, efficiency, community awareness, and health and well-being, advancing progress towards the sixth SDG.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Suárez Campoli & Tatiana Kimura Kodama & Marcelo Seido Nagano & Heloisa Lee Burnquist, 2025. "Progress of G20 Nations on the 6th Sustainable Development Goal Under the Circular Economy Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(5), pages 16966-16995, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02475-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02475-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-02475-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-02475-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02475-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.