Author
Abstract
Existing algorithms for generalized semi-infinite programs can only handle lower-level constraints containing equality constraints depending on upper-level variables (so-called coupling equality constraints) under limiting assumptions. More specifically, discretization-based algorithms require that the coupling equality constraints result in some lower-level variables being determined uniquely as implicit functions of the other lower-level and upper-level variables. We propose an adaptation of the discretization-based algorithm of Blankenship & Falk and demonstrate it can handle coupling equality constraints under the weaker assumption of stability of the solution set for these constraints in the sense of Lipschitz lower semi-continuity. The key idea is to allow a perturbation of the lower-level variable values from discretization points in connection with changes in the upper-level variables in the discretized upper-level problem. We enforce that these perturbed values satisfy the coupling equality constraints while remaining close to the discretization point, provided we can guarantee the stability of the solution in the sense that a nearby solution exists for small changes of the upper-level variables. We provide concrete realizations of the algorithm for three different situations: i) when knowledge about a certain Lipschitz constant is available, ii) when the coupling equality constraints are assumed to have full rank, and iii) when the coupling equality constraints are additionally linear in the lower-level variables. Numerical experiments on small test problems and a physically motivated problem related to power flow illustrate that the approach can be successfully applied to solve the challenging problems, but is currently limited in terms of scalability.
Suggested Citation
Aron Zingler & Adrian W. Lipow & Alexander Mitsos, 2025.
"Discretization algorithms for generalized semi-infinite programs with coupling equality constraints under local solution stability,"
Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 27-61, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:93:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-025-01515-3
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-025-01515-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:93:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-025-01515-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.