IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglont/v15y2025i1d10.1007_s40497-025-00445-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative economic livelihood models: techno-economic feasibility analysis of cage fish culture for entrepreneurial development of marginalised communities, Kerala, India

Author

Listed:
  • Vipinkumar V. P

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Sary P. S.

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Reshma Gills

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute
    ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management)

  • Swathi Lekshmi P. S

    (Veraval Regional Station of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Athira P. V.

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Ambrose T. V

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Binitha K. Vijayan

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • Smitha Rosey Xavier

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

Abstract

Innovative economic livelihood models like cage culture systems leverage creativity, technology and local resources to empower marginalised communities by promoting entrepreneurship and economic self-reliance, leading to sustainable development and inclusive growth. The Science Technology and Innovation (STI) Hub initiatives sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India further this empowerment by providing access to knowledge, training and resources, significantly aiding the socio-economic development and inclusion of Scheduled Caste (SC) communities. The study highlights the benefits of SHGs in economic livelihood models like cage culture, particularly for SC communities, by enhancing economic opportunities, strengthening social bonds and fostering a collaborative approach to aquaculture for sustainable development and inclusive growth. The study revealed that cage fish farming led by Self-Help Groups (SHGs) is financially viable, as evidenced by a benefit–cost ratio exceeding one, and increases participants’ Composite Empowerment Index (CEI) from 1.04 to 3.61, showing marked improvements in economic empowerment, self-esteem, decision-making and confidence. While participants face challenges such as high capital investment and costs of seeds as well as feed, strong social networks and interventions of STI-Hub help to mitigate issues like poaching and lack of awareness about fisheries schemes. Planned interventions in the form of appropriate policy guidelines to establish local finfish hatcheries, supported by government incentives to stimulate private investment and develop affordable alternative feed to reduce operational costs, enhancing the sustainability of cage culture operations are outlined to harness the potential of the livelihood model.

Suggested Citation

  • Vipinkumar V. P & Sary P. S. & Reshma Gills & Swathi Lekshmi P. S & Athira P. V. & Ambrose T. V & Binitha K. Vijayan & Smitha Rosey Xavier, 2025. "Innovative economic livelihood models: techno-economic feasibility analysis of cage fish culture for entrepreneurial development of marginalised communities, Kerala, India," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40497-025-00445-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40497-025-00445-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40497-025-00445-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40497-025-00445-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40497-025-00445-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.