Author
Abstract
The significance of farmers’ perceptions of climate risks, particularly in developing countries with limited capacity for adaptation, is equally important as the actual impacts, considering the increased risks posed by global climate change. This study examined smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate risks and adaptation strategies in coastal Ghana using a mixed-methods approach. A multi-stage sample technique was used to survey 800 farmers, and 8 farmers were selected as key informants through interviews in the coastal Savannah agroecological zone. Existing climatological records were analysed using the Kriging interpolation technique, and farmers’ adaptive capacity was predicted using binary logistic regression. The results revealed a substantial increase in farmers’ climate change knowledge. The majority of the farmers perceived increased temperatures (100%) and decreased total annual rainfall (64%), along with an increase in wind speed (100%) across the zone. The farmers revealed that extreme temperatures, drought, and decreasing rainfall result in the ripening of unmatured crops, the drying of crops, a decrease in crop yield, and farm losses. The farmers recognised poverty (75%) and food insecurity (23%) as the main effects of climate risks. The farmers have employed various adaptation strategies, including cultivating different types of crops (46%) and planting improved seed varieties (18%). However, financial constraints (48%) and high costs for farm inputs or fertilisers (32%) hinder these strategies. Farmers’ age, gender, education, and years of farming significantly predicted their decisions to adopt various adaptation strategies. Policy initiatives on subsidised farm inputs are required to safeguard the farmers’ activities and enhance their livelihoods.
Suggested Citation
Johnson Ankrah, 2025.
"Climate risks and adaptation strategies: the perspectives of farmers in coastal Ghana,"
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(3), pages 593-621, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00970-w
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00970-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00970-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.