Author
Listed:
- Andrew Sudmant
(Edinburgh Climate Change Institute, University of Edinburgh
Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds
Your Climate Strategy)
- Dom Boyle
(Price Waterhouse Coopers)
- Ruaidhri Higgins‐Lavery
(Edinburgh Climate Change Institute, University of Edinburgh)
- Andy Gouldson
(Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds)
- Andy Boyle
(Your Climate Strategy)
- James Fulker
(Price Waterhouse Coopers)
- Jamie Brogan
(Edinburgh Climate Change Institute, University of Edinburgh)
Abstract
Co-benefits are central to the case for climate action but are side-lined in many economic analyses. This paper presents an evaluation of three dimensions of the costs and benefits of climate change interventions in six urban regions of the UK. Findings indicate that meeting the UK’s 2033–2037 climate targets could yield £164 billion in total benefits. Notably, only 13% of these benefits are financial, in contrast to the 79% of which are social benefits. These social benefits include improvements in public health, reduced traffic congestion, and increased thermal comfort in homes. These results underscore the need for economic evaluations to expand their scope and move beyond the narrow financial cost–benefit analysis that predominates. Moreover, the magnitude of the social benefits underscores the need for integrating social and climate challenges in policymaking. Concurrently, the results demonstrate the sensitivity of the social benefits of climate actions to the normative aspects of empirical analysis. Determining whether emissions reductions in the transport sector, for example, should be achieved through the deployment of electric cars, expansion of public transport, and/or increases in walking and cycling requires both technical analysis and value-based decision making. Ensuring that decision-making processes are deliberate and transparent in empirical analysis is therefore critical. We conclude by suggesting that institutions such as the UK Climate Change Committee and Scottish Climate Intelligence Service should take the opportunity to be more explicit in the normative decisions embedded in their empirical work to demonstrate best practice for the wider research community.
Suggested Citation
Andrew Sudmant & Dom Boyle & Ruaidhri Higgins‐Lavery & Andy Gouldson & Andy Boyle & James Fulker & Jamie Brogan, 2025.
"Climate policy as social policy? A comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of climate action in the UK,"
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(3), pages 476-490, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00955-9
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00955-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00955-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.