IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v13y2023i1d10.1007_s13412-022-00800-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of brook trout in spatiotemporally separate locations using validated eDNA technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen P. Nolan

    (University of Guelph)

  • Tzitziki Loeza-Quintana

    (University of Guelph)

  • Hannah A. Little

    (University of Guelph
    University of Guelph)

  • Joschka McLeod

    (University of Guelph)

  • Benjamin Ranger

    (University of Guelph)

  • Danielle A. Borque

    (University of Guelph)

  • Robert H. Hanner

    (University of Guelph
    Biodiversity Institute of Ontario)

Abstract

Brook trout are a species of conservation concern in Southwestern Ontario, Canada, and effective monitoring of their populations is crucial for making informed management decisions. Electrofishing is a traditional, yet invasive, method that allows for fish abundance estimation. Environmental DNA (eDNA) is an emerging molecular tool that presents a non-invasive alternative to electrofishing. This study was a collaborative effort between researchers in academia, industry, and an NGO, with the following objectives: 1) compare eDNA detections with electrofishing when monitoring brook trout populations in a site of known occupancy, 2) compare existing eDNA collection methods, and 3) extend eDNA surveys to regions of unknown occupancy that could be of conservation concern (Hanlon Creek and Twelve Mile Creek, Ontario). First, eDNA sampling methods were validated with standard electrofishing. Water samples were filtered in tandem at each site using two commercially available eDNA samplers. The results suggest a significant difference in total eDNA capture and incidence of PCR inhibitors between the two autosamplers. Brook trout eDNA was detected at all locations in Hanlon Creek in September and November, as well as 5/6 sampling locations in Twelve Mile Creek. Brook trout signal in Hanlon Creek was stronger in November compared to September 2019, suggesting possible spawning activity. Brook trout eDNA was also detected in Twelve Mile Creek where brook trout were previously unreported. This study provides a technical validation for the use of eDNA in brook trout monitoring and illustrates the opportunity to use eDNA surveys in regulated settings to complement and improve conventional biomonitoring methods for the management of elusive species.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen P. Nolan & Tzitziki Loeza-Quintana & Hannah A. Little & Joschka McLeod & Benjamin Ranger & Danielle A. Borque & Robert H. Hanner, 2023. "Detection of brook trout in spatiotemporally separate locations using validated eDNA technology," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 66-82, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00800-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-022-00800-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-022-00800-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-022-00800-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Petruniak & Douglas Bradley & Jocelyn M. Kelly & Robert H. Hanner, 2021. "Commentary: integrating environmental DNA into applied ecological practice," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 6-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00800-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.