Author
Listed:
- Oscar Contreras-Velasco
(University of California)
- Nathan P. Jones
(Sam Houston State University)
- Daniel Weisz Argomedo
(University of California)
- John P. Sullivan
(University of Southern California)
- Chris Callaghan
(CSG Justice Center)
Abstract
Covert or dark networks, such as those formed by organized crime or illicit alliances, pose unique challenges for link prediction research due to their inherent secrecy and data incompleteness. In this study, we compare a suite of advanced methods for inferring missing links in covert networks, including classical node similarity indices, graph embedding approaches, and GNN-based methods. We evaluate them on two real-world datasets: the Lantia dataset (a 2021 network of alliances between criminal organizations) and the 2020 Bacrim dataset (an open dataset on alliances among Mexican criminal groups in 2020). Our experiments focus on how these algorithms handle missing or partially observed links, a common reality in covert networks. Performance is measured using Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and F1 scores. Although classical similarity measures and embedding algorithms offer meaningful predictions, GNN-based models, particularly the Graph Convolutional Network, consistently achieve near-perfect AUC and F1 scores. These results highlight that learning from the broader graph topology via GNNs can effectively uncover hidden ties in incomplete and inherently noisy covert network data. Our findings provide practical guidance for researchers, analysts, and policymakers looking to identify future or missing alliances in large, fragmented, and illicit networks.
Suggested Citation
Oscar Contreras-Velasco & Nathan P. Jones & Daniel Weisz Argomedo & John P. Sullivan & Chris Callaghan, 2025.
"Uncovering hidden alliances in organized crime networks with machine learning: from node similarity to graph neural networks,"
Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, November.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00429-0
DOI: 10.1007/s42001-025-00429-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00429-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.