IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v8y2025i4d10.1007_s42001-025-00428-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings

Author

Listed:
  • Hatice Yildiz Durak

    (Necmettin Erbakan University)

  • Aytuğ Onan

    (Software Engineering, Izmir Katip Celebi University)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been an important milestone in feedback applications in education. To identify and guide the effective use of AI in educational settings, it is necessary to examine research trends with a holistic approach. In addition, it is also important to analyze the feedback design and its effects on the learning process in studies applying AI-based feedback approaches. Based on all these situations, this study aims to conduct a systematic literature review with studies involving AI-based feedback applications. In the study, 953 publications indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) SSCI database between 2014 and 2024 were listed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 91 articles were included in the final analysis. The descriptive results indicate a significant increase in the number of publications over the past two years, with the majority of articles appearing in the journal Education and Information Technologies. Experimental methodologies were identified as the most frequently employed approaches. The most prevalent participant group was identified as university students. The findings suggest that AI-based feedback systems have considerable potential to deliver real-time feedback that is tailored and personalised to meet individual students’ needs. The utilisation of AI-based feedback systems has been demonstrated to enhance various aspects of learning, including motivation, attitude, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and autonomy. Furthermore, they facilitate teacher-student interactions and have the potential to strengthen collaborative learning processes. However, despite the benefits offered by AI-based feedback systems in education, several challenges and risks persist, including insufficient contextual sensitivity, algorithmic bias, overreliance on technology, and a possible decline in teacher-student interactions. A critical review of the extant literature identified significant gaps, including the need for effective feedback systems designed for diverse age and cultural groups, as well as the creation of personalised feedback models informed by emotional analysis. On the other hand, the reviewed studies reported that the use of hybrid models has the potential to further increase the effectiveness of AI-based feedback systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatice Yildiz Durak & Aytuğ Onan, 2025. "A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1-40, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00428-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-025-00428-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-025-00428-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-025-00428-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00428-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.