IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v36y2018i2d10.1007_s10878-018-0292-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On approximating optimal weight “no”-certificates in weighted difference constraint systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bugra Caskurlu

    (TOBB University of Economics and Technology)

  • Matthew Williamson

    (Marietta College)

  • K. Subramani

    (West Virginia University)

  • Vahan Mkrtchyan

    (University of Verona)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the design and analysis of approximation algorithms for the problem of determining the least weight refutation in a weighted difference constraint system. Recall that a difference constraint is a linear constraint of the form $$x_{i}-x_{j} \le b_{ij}$$ x i - x j ≤ b ij and a conjunction of such constraints is called a difference constraint system (DCS). In a weighted DCS (WDCS), a positive weight is associated with each constraint. Every infeasible constraint system has a refutation, which attests to its infeasibility. In the case of a DCS, this refutation is a subset of the input constraints, which when added together produces a contradiction of the form $$0 \le -b$$ 0 ≤ - b , $$b> 0$$ b > 0 . It follows that every refutation acts as a “no”-certificate. The length of a refutation is the number of constraints used in the derivation of a contradiction. Associated with a DCS $$\mathbf{D: A\cdot x \le b}$$ D : A · x ≤ b is its constraint network $$\mathbf{G= \langle V,E, b \rangle }$$ G = ⟨ V , E , b ⟩ . It is well-known that $$\mathbf{D}$$ D is infeasible if and only if $$\mathbf{G}$$ G contains a simple, negative cost cycle. Previous research has established that every negative cost cycle of length k in $$\mathbf{G}$$ G corresponds exactly to a refutation of $$\mathbf{D}$$ D using k constraints. It follows that the shortest refutation of $$\mathbf{D}$$ D (i.e., the refutation which uses the fewest number of constraints) corresponds to the length of the shortest negative cycle in $$\mathbf{G}$$ G . The constraint network of a WDCS is represented by a constraint network $$\mathbf{G = \langle V, E, b, l \rangle }$$ G = ⟨ V , E , b , l ⟩ , where $$\mathbf{l}:\mathbf{E \rightarrow \mathbb {N}}$$ l : E → N represents a function which associates a positive, integral length with each edge in $$\mathbf{G}$$ G . In the case of a WDCS, the weight of a refutation is defined as the sum of the lengths of the edges corresponding to the refutation. The problem of finding the minimum weight refutation in a WDCS is called the weighted optimal length resolution refutation (WOLRR) problem and is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, we describe a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for the WOLRR problem and convert it into a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS).

Suggested Citation

  • Bugra Caskurlu & Matthew Williamson & K. Subramani & Vahan Mkrtchyan, 2018. "On approximating optimal weight “no”-certificates in weighted difference constraint systems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 329-345, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:36:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-018-0292-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-018-0292-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-018-0292-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-018-0292-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:36:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-018-0292-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.