IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v35y2018i2d10.1007_s10878-017-0176-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A certifying algorithm for lattice point feasibility in a system of UTVPI constraints

Author

Listed:
  • K. Subramani

    (West Virginia University)

  • Piotr Wojciechowski

    (West Virginia University)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the design and analysis of a certifying algorithm for checking the lattice point feasibility of a class of constraints called unit two variable per inequality (UTVPI) constraints. A UTVPI constraint has at most two non-zero variables and the coefficients of the non-zero variables belong to the set $$\{+\,1,\ -\,1\}$$ { + 1 , - 1 } . These constraints occur in a number of application domains, including but not limited to program verification, abstract interpretation, and operations research. As per the literature, the fastest known model generating algorithm for checking lattice point feasibility in UTVPI constraint systems runs in $$O(m \cdot n+n^{2} \cdot \log n)$$ O ( m · n + n 2 · log n ) time and $$O(n^{2})$$ O ( n 2 ) space, where m represents the number of constraints and n represents the number of variables in the constraint system (Lahiri and Musuvathi, in: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on the frontiers of combining systems (FroCos), lecture notes in computer science, vol 3717, pp 168–183, 2005). In this paper, we design and analyze a new algorithm for checking the lattice point feasibility of UTVPI constraints. The presented algorithm runs in $$O(m \cdot n)$$ O ( m · n ) time and $$O(m+n)$$ O ( m + n ) space. Additionally it is certifying in that it produces a satisfying assignment in the event that it is presented with feasible instances and refutations in the event that it is presented with infeasible instances. The importance of providing certificates cannot be overemphasized, especially in mission-critical applications. Our approaches for the lattice point feasibility problem in UTVPI constraint systems is fundamentally different from existing approaches for this problem; indeed, it is based on new insights into combining well-known inference rules for these systems.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Subramani & Piotr Wojciechowski, 2018. "A certifying algorithm for lattice point feasibility in a system of UTVPI constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 389-408, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:35:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0176-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0176-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-017-0176-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-017-0176-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Schutt & Peter J. Stuckey, 2010. "Incremental Satisfiability and Implication for UTVPI Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 514-527, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:35:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0176-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.