IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v33y2017i3d10.1007_s10878-016-0024-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient reassembling of graphs, part 1: the linear case

Author

Listed:
  • Assaf Kfoury

    (Boston University)

  • Saber Mirzaei

    (Boston University)

Abstract

The reassembling of a simple connected graph $$G = (V,E)$$ G = ( V , E ) is an abstraction of a problem arising in earlier studies of network analysis. Its simplest formulation is in two steps: (1) We cut every edge of G into two halves, thus obtaining a collection of $$n = |\,V\,|$$ n = | V | one-vertex components, such that for every $$v\in V$$ v ∈ V the one-vertex component $$\{ v \}$$ { v } has $${{degree}}_{}(v)$$ d e g r e e ( v ) half edges attached to it. (2) We splice the two halves of every edge together, not of all the edges at once, but in some ordering $$\Theta $$ Θ of the edges that minimizes two measures that depend on the edge-boundary degrees of assembled components. A component A is a subset of V and its edge-boundary degree is the number of edges in G with one endpoint in A and one endpoint in $$V-A$$ V - A (which is the same as the number of half edges attached to A after all edges with both endpoints in A have been spliced together). The maximum edge-boundary degree encountered during the reassembling process is what we call the $$\varvec{\alpha }$$ α -measure of the reassembling, and the sum of all edge-boundary degrees is its $$\varvec{\beta }$$ β -measure. The $$\alpha $$ α -optimization (resp. $$\beta $$ β -optimization) of the reassembling of G is to determine an order $$\Theta $$ Θ for splicing the edges that minimizes its $$\alpha $$ α -measure (resp. $$\beta $$ β -measure). There are different forms of reassembling, depending on restrictions and variations on the ordering $$\Theta $$ Θ of the edges. We consider only cases satisfying the condition that if an edge between disjoint components A and B is spliced, then all the edges between A and B are spliced at the same time. In this report, we examine the particular case of linear reassembling, which requires that the next edge to be spliced must be adjacent to an already spliced edge. We delay other forms of reassembling to follow-up reports. We prove that $$\alpha $$ α -optimization of linear reassembling and minimum-cutwidth linear arrangment ( $$\mathrm{CutWidth}$$ CutWidth ) are polynomially reducible to each other, and that $$\beta $$ β -optimization of linear reassembling and minimum-cost linear arrangement ( $$\mathrm{MinArr}$$ MinArr ) are polynomially reducible to each other. The known NP-hardness of $$\mathrm{CutWidth}$$ CutWidth and $$\mathrm{MinArr}$$ MinArr imply the NP-hardness of $$\alpha $$ α -optimization and $$\beta $$ β -optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Assaf Kfoury & Saber Mirzaei, 2017. "Efficient reassembling of graphs, part 1: the linear case," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1057-1089, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:33:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0024-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-0024-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-016-0024-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-016-0024-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Assaf Kfoury & Laura Sisson, 2020. "Efficient reassembling of three-regular planar graphs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1153-1207, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:33:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0024-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.