Author
Listed:
- Kevin Kloos
(Leiden University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Methodology and Statistics Unit)
- Julian D. Karch
(Leiden University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Methodology and Statistics Unit)
- Quinten A. Meertens
(University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Economics, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance)
- Sander Scholtus
(Statistics Netherlands, Department of Methodology)
- Mark de Rooij
(Leiden University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Methodology and Statistics Unit)
Abstract
A quantifier is a supervised machine learning algorithm that focuses on estimating the class prevalence in a data set rather than labeling its individual observations. We introduce continuous sweep, a new parametric binary quantifier inspired by the well-performing median sweep, which is an ensemble method based on adjusted count estimators. We modified two aspects of median sweep: (1) using parametric class distributions instead of empirical distributions for the true and false positive rates; (2) using the mean instead of the median of a set of adjusted count estimates. These two modifications allow for a theoretical analysis of the bias and variance of the continuous sweep. Furthermore, the expressions of bias and variance can be used to define optimal decision boundaries of the set of adjusted count estimates to be used in the ensemble. In three simulation studies, we show that continuous sweep outperforms the quantifiers in the group classify, count, and correct, including median sweep, and is competitive with the two best quantifiers in the group distribution matchers. Also, an empirical data set is analyzed with these quantifiers, showing similar performances.
Suggested Citation
Kevin Kloos & Julian D. Karch & Quinten A. Meertens & Sander Scholtus & Mark de Rooij, 2026.
"Continuous Sweep for Binary Quantification Learning,"
Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 43(2), pages 554-584, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jclass:v:43:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s00357-026-09548-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00357-026-09548-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:43:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s00357-026-09548-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.