IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i3d10.1007_s10796-015-9557-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart CloudBench—A framework for evaluating cloud infrastructure performance

Author

Listed:
  • Mohan Baruwal Chhetri

    (Swinburne University of Technology)

  • Sergei Chichin

    (Swinburne University of Technology)

  • Quoc Bao Vo

    (Swinburne University of Technology)

  • Ryszard Kowalczyk

    (Swinburne University of Technology
    Polish Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Cloud migration allows organizations to benefit from reduced operational costs, improved flexibility, and greater scalability, and enables them to focus on core business goals. However, it also has the flip side of reduced visibility. Enterprises considering migration of their IT systems to the cloud only have a black box view of the offered infrastructure. While information about server pricing and specification is publicly available, there is limited information about cloud infrastructure performance. Comparison of alternative cloud infrastructure offerings based only on price and server specification is difficult because cloud vendors use heterogeneous hardware resources, offer different server configurations, apply different pricing models and use different virtualization techniques to provision them. Benchmarking the performance of software systems deployed on the top of the black box cloud infrastructure offers one way to evaluate the performance of available cloud server alternatives. However, this process can be complex, time-consuming and expensive, and cloud consumers can greatly benefit from tools that can automate it. Smart CloudBench is a generic framework and system that offers automated, on-demand, real-time and customized benchmarking of software systems deployed on cloud infrastructure. It provides greater visibility and insight into the run-time behavior of cloud infrastructure, helping consumers to compare and contrast available offerings during the initial cloud selection phase, and monitor performance for service quality assurance during the subsequent cloud consumption phase. In this paper, we first discuss the rationale behind our approach for benchmarking the black box cloud infrastructure. Then, we propose a generic architecture for benchmarking representative applications on the heterogeneous cloud infrastructure and describe the Smart CloudBench benchmarking workflow. We also present simple use case scenarios that highlight the need for tools such as Smart CloudBench.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohan Baruwal Chhetri & Sergei Chichin & Quoc Bao Vo & Ryszard Kowalczyk, 2016. "Smart CloudBench—A framework for evaluating cloud infrastructure performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 413-428, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9557-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9557-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9557-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9557-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haluk Demirkan & James C. Spohrer, 2016. "Emerging service orientations and transformations (SOT)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 407-411, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9557-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.