IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i5d10.1007_s13198-018-0736-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model based test case prioritization using UML behavioural diagrams and association rule mining

Author

Listed:
  • Prateeva Mahali

    (National Institute of Technology)

  • Durga Prasad Mohapatra

    (National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

In software development life cycle, maximum effort is spent on the maintenance phase. This is due to the retesting carried out in this phase to ensure that any moderation made to the system under test (SUT) does not hamper the unchanged components of the SUT. This retesting is a part of regression testing which is performed in the maintenance phase. But in the retesting approach, all the old test cases are re-executed which leads to increase in cost and time of testing. So, test case prioritization technique is widely used to overcome this problem i.e. to keep the testing cost and time down. Test case prioritization techniques schedule the test cases for regression testing in an order that improves rate of fault detection, coverage percentage etc. To improve the fault detection rate, we propose an approach for prioritizing the test cases by using multiple modified functions and association rule mining. Since, we are doing model based testing, UML (Unified Modelling Language) behavioural diagrams such as activity diagram and sequence diagram are used to model the system. An activity sequence graph (ASG) is generated taking into account the combined features of activity diagram and sequence diagram. Then, test scenarios are generated by traversing the graph. The affected nodes and corresponding modified nodes are found out using forward slicing algorithm. The details of modified nodes and corresponding affected nodes are stored in a project repository. Then, association rule mining (ARM) is applied to the historical data to generate the frequent pattern. Finally, test cases are prioritized based on business criticality test value (BCTV) and frequent pattern. We have also verified the effectiveness of proposed approach by determining the percentage of fault detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Prateeva Mahali & Durga Prasad Mohapatra, 2018. "Model based test case prioritization using UML behavioural diagrams and association rule mining," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1063-1079, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0736-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-018-0736-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-018-0736-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-018-0736-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namita Panda & Durga Prasad Mohapatra, 2021. "Test scenario prioritization from user requirements for web-based software," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(3), pages 361-376, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0736-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.