IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i12d10.1007_s13198-025-02904-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing usability of business rules in software systems: a comparative study of SBVR and DMN business rules writing methods

Author

Listed:
  • Maheen Arshad

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Maham Haq

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Muhammad Uzair Khan

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Atif Aftab Jilani

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Shafiq-Ur- Rehman

    (Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University (IMSIU))

Abstract

The usability of business rule representation methods is essential for ensuring the efficiency and effectiveness of software systems, particularly in software development life cycle (SDLC) activities like software testing. Business rules govern software behavior, ensuring consistency, accuracy, and compliance. This paper compares two business rule methods Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules (SBVR) and Decision Model and Notation (DMN) to assess their effectiveness in SDLC activities. While BPMN is widely used for modeling business processes, it lacks explicit business rule representation, leading to potential transparency and execution challenges. We evaluated SBVR and DMN to address these issues using seven key usability metrics: understandability, modifiability, ease of use, effectiveness, user satisfaction, efficiency, and learnability. We evaluated SBVR and DMN with 142 software engineering students in a crossover experiment involving two case studies: FLEX (academic management) and EU Rent (car reservation). Our findings indicate that DMN outperforms SBVR in several usability areas offering insights for developers, analysts, and system implementers.

Suggested Citation

  • Maheen Arshad & Maham Haq & Muhammad Uzair Khan & Atif Aftab Jilani & Shafiq-Ur- Rehman, 2025. "Enhancing usability of business rules in software systems: a comparative study of SBVR and DMN business rules writing methods," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(12), pages 3928-3947, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02904-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02904-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02904-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-025-02904-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02904-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.