IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i10d10.1007_s13198-025-02869-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating weightage and prioritizing major domains of inclusive education assessment framework using analytical hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • Umesh Kumar

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

  • Haimanti Banerji

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

Abstract

Inclusive education, imperative globally, addresses the challenges faced by a substantial population with disabilities. The principles of human factor engineering, centered on creating a holistic, safe, and sustainable environment, directly align with mainstreaming persons with disabilities. Quality education, a vital aspect of sustainable development goals, enhances societal resilience. In India, the absence of facilities, resources, inclusive infrastructure, and a barrier-free environment hampers inclusive school achievement. Additionally, financial constraints in developing countries like India necessitate resource-efficient prioritization strategies. While previous studies have attempted to assess inclusive education, they often lack a structured methodology to systematically prioritize key domains, limiting their applicability in decision-making. This study contributes to an ongoing investigation, creating an assessment framework for successful inclusive education in Delhi’s elementary schools. Using a two-round fuzzy Delphi method, consensus analysis with 25 experts identified 33 assessment indicators across seven domains. To overcome limitations in existing prioritization and weightage identification methods, this study employs both the analytical hierarchy process and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to assign weights to these domains and to prioritize them. A paper-based survey collected responses from 71 education professionals which uses a scale from 1 to 9 for pairwise comparisons between the domains. Results from both methods indicate that “availability of appropriate resources” holds the highest weightage, while “teacher’s attitude” ranks the lowest. This research provides a novel, structured approach to identify the domain weightage and prioritization, addressing existing methodological gaps and enhancing decision-making in inclusive education. The findings serve as a foundation for a scoring methodology of the assessment framework of inclusive education; also this can guide policymakers in strategic planning, resource allocation, and the development of inclusive schools in India. Future work involves developing an assessment framework for effective inclusive education which further improves inclusive education planning and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Umesh Kumar & Haimanti Banerji, 2025. "Estimating weightage and prioritizing major domains of inclusive education assessment framework using analytical hierarchy process," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(10), pages 3440-3451, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02869-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02869-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02869-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-025-02869-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02869-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.