Author
Abstract
Image tampering detection is a critical area of research, given the widespread use of manipulated images for deceptive purposes. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown significant potential in automating the identification of tampered images. This paper presents customized deep learning model to detect tampering class with comparative analysis of CNN architectures—ResNet50V2, InceptionNetV3, MobileNetV2, and the proposed CNN, for image tampering detection. The proposed approach encompasses a dataset comprising four distinct classes: copy-move, inpaint, splicing, and normal images. This study sheds light on the comparative strengths and weaknesses of these CNN architectures. The dataset encompasses the key tampered classes, offering a holistic assessment of each model's ability to identify various tampering techniques. The custom CNN architecture is specifically tailored for this task, aiming to evaluate its efficiency compared to the established CNNs. Metrics for training and evaluation are standardized to generate equitable comparisons, encompassing performance indicators such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.This research contributes the knowledge in the field of image tampering detection, offering a comprehensive evaluation of multiple CNN architectures. Additionally, the effectiveness of separable convolutional layers is explored in deep neural networks, showcasing their potential to enhance scalability and effectiveness across various tasks in machine learning and computer vision. The proposed model, designed with separable convolution layers, exhibits superior validation accuracy and training accuracy compared to the other models under evaluation. Notably, The proposed customized model achieved an impressive F1 score of 96%, highlighting its proficiency in accurately detecting tampered regions within images while minimizing false positives.
Suggested Citation
Sachin Saxena & Archana Singh & Shailesh Tiwari, 2025.
"Prediction model for digital image tampering using customised deep neural network techniques,"
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(10), pages 3263-3271, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02420-w
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02420-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02420-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.