IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v48y2003i5p317-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pourquoi se préoccupe-t-on tant des données probantes en promotion de la santé?

Author

Listed:
  • Michel O’Neill

Abstract

Why do we worry about evidence in health promotion? This paper, in a sociological and historical perspective, aims at positioning the main issues linked to the idea of utilizing evidence-based practices in health promotion. It begins to do so by looking at the international evolution of health promotion and evidence-based practices, and by providing definitions for these concepts. In a second section, the paper analyzes how the evidence based practices approach has confronted the field of health promotion, especially since the second half of the 1990s. It argues that this has occurred in the context of the evaluative concerns put forward by governments all over the world, in order to downsize their publicly funded health systems. The reaction, often negative, of the health promotion field to evidence-based practices is also documented. Finally, some methodological and political issues raised by the idea of utilizing evidence-based practices in health promotion are presented. The paper concludes that this approach is far from a panacea but has potential limited utilization for certain kinds of health promotion practices. Alternative suggestions on how to establish “best practices” in this field are also offered. Copyright Birkhäuser-Verlag Basel 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Michel O’Neill, 2003. "Pourquoi se préoccupe-t-on tant des données probantes en promotion de la santé?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 48(5), pages 317-326, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:48:y:2003:i:5:p:317-326
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-003-2036-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-003-2036-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-003-2036-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:48:y:2003:i:5:p:317-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.