IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v48y2003i2p115-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weiterentwicklung des Gesundheitswesens aus Bürgersicht: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevökerungsbefragung in München, Dresden, Wien und Bern

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Brunner
  • Tomás Carla Sabariego
  • Manfred Wildner

Abstract

¶ The citizen's view on the development of health care systems: results of a representative survey in Munich, Dresden, Vienna and Berne¶ Objectives: The presented study deals with the citizen's view on the development of health care systems. It aims to generate research hypotheses as basis for further studies.¶ Methods: During February through March 2000 computer-assisted telephone surveys were conducted in Munich, Dresden, Berne and Vienna. Respondents were asked for desired changes in the health care system, among others. 502 interviews were completed. The response rate from target person contacts was 43% to 60%.¶ Results: Improvements were desired most frequently for the domains interaction between therapist and patient, systems organisation and finances. Regional differences in the relative importance of these areas were found, gender specific differences were less prominent. Differences between Dresden and Munich point to persistent disparities within Germany.¶ Conclusions: The identification of systems-related determinants or deficits bears opportunities for a citizen-centered, humane development of health care systems. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag Basel, 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Brunner & Tomás Carla Sabariego & Manfred Wildner, 2003. "Weiterentwicklung des Gesundheitswesens aus Bürgersicht: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevökerungsbefragung in München, Dresden, Wien und Bern," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 48(2), pages 115-120, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:48:y:2003:i:2:p:115-120
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-003-2075-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-003-2075-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-003-2075-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:48:y:2003:i:2:p:115-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.