IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v47y2002i3p172-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking and rescoring the SF-12

Author

Listed:
  • David Wilson
  • Graeme Tucker
  • Catherine Chittleborough

Abstract

Bien qu'il soit possible d'établir une version australienne valide du SF-12, l'utilisation de la version américaine du SF-12 peut être utilisée pour des raisons de comparabilité internationale, mais en utilisant un système de pondération spéifique basé sur des modèles d'équation structurelles. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag 2002

Suggested Citation

  • David Wilson & Graeme Tucker & Catherine Chittleborough, 2002. "Rethinking and rescoring the SF-12," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 47(3), pages 172-177, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:47:y:2002:i:3:p:172-177
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01591889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01591889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01591889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Wilson & Jacqueline Parsons & Graeme Tucker, 2000. "The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 45(6), pages 239-246, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathasha Udugampolage & Rosario Caruso & Mariangela Panetta & Edward Callus & Federica Dellafiore & Arianna Magon & Susan Marelli & Alessandro Pini, 2021. "Is SF-12 a valid and reliable measurement of health-related quality of life among adults with Marfan syndrome? A confirmatory study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Lercher & Paul B. Tchounwou, 2017. "Comments by the Academic Editors to Responses and Replies Concerning Mroczek et al.’s “Evaluation of Quality of Life of Those Living near a Wind Farm“: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12 , 6," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-6, March.
    2. Susanne Theis & Norman Bitterlich & Michael von Wolff & Petra Stute, 2024. "Measuring Quality of Life: Incorporating Objectively Measurable Parameters within the Cross-Sectional Bern Cohort Study 2014 (BeCS-14)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Graeme Tucker & Robert Adams & David Wilson, 2013. "Observed Agreement Problems between Sub-Scales and Summary Components of the SF-36 Version 2 - An Alternative Scoring Method Can Correct the Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality-of-life-SF-12-Validity;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:47:y:2002:i:3:p:172-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.