Author
Abstract
The UK is one of the pioneers of electricity liberalization. In the 1990s it implemented ownership unbundling and then from 1998 carried out the liberalization of retail supply. The share of renewable energy has since increased and the government is pursuing policies aiming at the decarbonization of the economy. As part of this policy, the number of coal-fired plants has been reduced. At the same time, the older nuclear plants are being closed and while there are plans to replace these, new nuclear power station building is facing difficulties because of high costs and the uncertainties caused by Brexit. Alternative tactics for Small Modular Reactors are being considered and consulted on at present. Liberalization has allowed customers to select their retail suppliers, but since 2004 they have seen retail prices rise with increasing wholesale costs and enhanced environmental and social standards. The market has also remained oligopolistic, requiring continued monitoring by regulatory agencies to protect end-users. Japan, on the other hand, started its reform of the electricity wholesale market in 1995 and that of the retail supply market in 2000, but to avoid disruption the liberalization process has been gentler. The huge earthquake and tsunami in the Tohoku region in 2011 complicated the situation with the serious problems it brought for nuclear power plants. The government has announced plans for diversifying the generation mix but has not yet developed concrete policies to this end. Also, unlike the UK which is linked to neighboring countries with cross-border interconnectors, Japan is geographically isolated. To achieve security of electricity supply, the construction of a Smart Grid and cross-border interconnections are essential in the near future. In addition, a Price Cap (Tariff Cap) will be indispensable to protect consumers.
Suggested Citation
Munenori Nomura, 2019.
"Security of electricity supply after liberalization: implications of the experience of UK market reform,"
International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 43-64, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ijoeps:v:13:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s42495-018-0011-6
DOI: 10.1007/s42495-018-0011-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijoeps:v:13:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s42495-018-0011-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.