IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v9y2019i1d10.1186_s13561-019-0237-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain

Author

Listed:
  • M. Chris Runken

    (Grifols Shared Services North America (SSNA), Inc.)

  • Paolo Caraceni

    (Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna)

  • Javier Fernandez

    (University of Barcelona
    European Foundation of Chronic Liver Failure (EF-Clif))

  • Alexander Zipprich

    (Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Rashad Carlton

    (Xcenda L.L.C)

  • Martin Bunke

    (Senior Director Medical Affairs, Retrophin)

Abstract

Background Albumin is frequently prescribed in cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation. However, the true cost effectiveness of albumin use in cirrhotic patients is still under debate. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain. Methods A decision-tree economic model was developed to evaluate treatments for decompensated cirrhosis from the hospital perspective over a typical inpatient admission. The treatments for large volume paracentesis (LVP) were albumin vs saline, gelatin, or no fluid. The treatments for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were albumin plus antibiotics vs antibiotics alone. The treatments for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) were albumin plus a vasoconstrictor vs a vasoconstrictor alone. Effectiveness inputs were literature-based. Cost inputs included pharmacy costs and medical complication costs of decompensated cirrhosis. The primary model assessments were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life saved and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results Albumin was found to be both less costly and more effective relative to saline, gelatin, and no fluid for the treatment of LVP across all 3 countries. For SBP, albumin plus antibiotics was more clinically effective than antibiotics alone in all 3 countries. The combination of albumin plus antibiotics was less costly than antibiotics alone in Germany and Italy, making albumin a dominant treatment (ie, less costly and more effective). In the management of SBP in Spain, albumin plus antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone resulted in ICERs of €1516 per life saved and €3369 per QALY gained. Albumin plus a vasoconstrictor was both less costly and more effective than vasoconstrictor alone in the treatment of HRS across all 3 countries. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates that albumin is cost-effective in terms of lives saved and QALYs gained in the management of decompensated cirrhosis associated with LVP, SBP, or HRS.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Chris Runken & Paolo Caraceni & Javier Fernandez & Alexander Zipprich & Rashad Carlton & Martin Bunke, 2019. "The cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:9:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-019-0237-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-019-0237-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-019-0237-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-019-0237-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:9:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-019-0237-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.