IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v6y2016i1d10.1186_s13561-016-0104-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin

Author

Listed:
  • Varun Vaidya

    (University of Toledo)

  • Keyuri Adhikari

    (Novartis Pharmaceuticals)

  • Jack Sheehan

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Iftekhar Kalsekar

    (Johnson & Johnson)

Abstract

Objectives Saxagliptin and sitagliptin are two commonly used dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Little is known about their comparative effectiveness in the real world, particularly their impact on cost and resources use. The objective of this study was to analyze charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin to understand the impact of these DPP-4 inhibitor treatment options in a real-world setting. Methods This was a retrospective, new-user study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Toledo. Data were collected from a US insurance claims dataset (OptumInsight) for patients newly initiating treatment with saxagliptin or sitagliptin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011. ICD-9 code 250 was used to identify patients with T2D. Overall and diabetes-related medical and pharmacy charges were observed. Inpatient hospitalizations were also compared. Propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts of patients prescribed saxagliptin and sitagliptin. Appropriate univariate statistical tests were applied to the propensity-matched sample to examine differences in resource utilization outcomes. Statistical significance was evaluated at P

Suggested Citation

  • Varun Vaidya & Keyuri Adhikari & Jack Sheehan & Iftekhar Kalsekar, 2016. "Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:6:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-016-0104-8
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:6:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-016-0104-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.