IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v15y2025i1d10.1186_s13561-025-00656-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China

Author

Listed:
  • Luwei Wang

    (Xiamen University)

  • Jiasheng Chen

    (Xiamen University)

  • Lihui Lin

    (Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University)

  • Xiaowei Huang

    (Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University)

Abstract

Purpose Squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC), a subtype with few targetable mutations, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Platinum-based chemo-therapy, the first-line treatment, yields median overall survival (OS) of less than or equal to one year, underscoring the need for better therapies. Penpulimab, a novel PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, is a humanized IgG1 antibody with a modified Fc region. Phase III trial data (AK105-302) showed penpulimab + carboplatin-paclitaxel (PEN-CP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in metastatic sqNSCLC vs. placebo (CP), with a favorable safety profile. However, its high cost and lack of cost-effectiveness analyses warrant further study. This research evaluates PEN-CP’s cost-effectiveness vs. CP from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Methods A three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEN-CP as a first-line treatment for metastatic sqNSCLC. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from the AK105-302 trial, while drug costs were derived from national tender prices. Additional costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). To assess the robustness of the findings, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Compared to CP, the ICER for PEN-CP was $14,918.81 per QALY. The ICER values were below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY. The key drivers of the model outcomes were the price of penpulimab, the PFS stage utility value, and the cost of optimal supportive care. Conclusions From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, penpulimab combined with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY for patients with metastatic sqNSCLC and represents a promising first-line treatment option.

Suggested Citation

  • Luwei Wang & Jiasheng Chen & Lihui Lin & Xiaowei Huang, 2025. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00656-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00656-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.