Author
Listed:
- Sabrina Kepka
(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
ICUBE UMR 7357 CNRS, équipe IMAGeS
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg)
- Kevin Zarca
(URCEco, Hôtel Dieu, AP-HP)
- Mickaël Ohana
(ICUBE UMR 7357 CNRS, équipe IMAGeS
Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg)
- Louise Hoffbeck
(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg)
- Charlène Heimann
(Hôpital Emile Muller)
- Pierrick Le Borgne
(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
UMR 1260, INSERM / Université de Strasbourg CRBS)
- François Severac
(ICUBE UMR 7357 CNRS, équipe IMAGeS
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg)
- Joris Muller
(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, CHRU of Strasbourg)
- Erik-André Sauleau
(ICUBE UMR 7357 CNRS, équipe IMAGeS
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg)
- Pascal Bilbault
(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
UMR 1260, INSERM / Université de Strasbourg CRBS)
- Isabelle Durand Zaleski
(URCEco, Hôtel Dieu, AP-HP
Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA)
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED). Methods We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT. Conclusions In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS. Trial registration This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).
Suggested Citation
Sabrina Kepka & Kevin Zarca & Mickaël Ohana & Louise Hoffbeck & Charlène Heimann & Pierrick Le Borgne & François Severac & Joris Muller & Erik-André Sauleau & Pascal Bilbault & Isabelle Durand Zaleski, 2025.
"Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study,"
Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00625-8
DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00625-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.