IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v14y2024i1d10.1186_s13561-024-00496-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic effect of financial compensation in China’s healthcare system: comprehensive insights regarding supply and demand factors

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Guo

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Xuezhi Hong

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Dongmei Li

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Qiannan An

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Wenwen Fan

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Minghe Yang

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Luyang Xiao

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

Abstract

Objectives We aim to analyse the effects of government subsidies on residents’ health and healthcare expenditure from the perspectives of supply and demand. Data and methods According to the regional division adopted in the data query system of the National Bureau of Statistics, this study divides 31 provinces and cities into three regions: eastern, central, and western. The data used are from public databases, such as the “China Statistical Yearbook,” “China Health Statistical Yearbook,” and “Government Final Account Report”. In this study, mathematical model derivation is used to construct a fixed effects model, and an empirical study based on cross-sectional data and general linear regression is conducted. To prevent endogeneity issues, this study introduces instrumental variables and uses 2SLS regression to further analyse the output results. Results For every 1% increase in supplementary funding on the supply side, the perinatal mortality rate decreases by 1.765%, while for every 1% increase in financial compensation on the demand side, per capita outpatient expenses increase by 0.225% and per capita hospitalization expenses increase by 0.196%. Regarding medical resources, for every 1% increase in the number of beds per 1,000 people, per capita hospitalization expenses decrease by 0.099%. In the central and eastern regions, where economic levels are higher, supply-side government funding is more effective than demand-side funding. In contrast, demand-side funding is more effective in the western region. Conclusions The roles of multiple influencing factors and significant regional heterogeneity are clarified. Increasing financial compensation to providers positively impacts perinatal mortality but leads to higher per capita outpatient and hospital expenditures. Finally, this study provides targeted policy recommendations and solid theoretical support for policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Guo & Xuezhi Hong & Dongmei Li & Qiannan An & Wenwen Fan & Minghe Yang & Luyang Xiao, 2024. "The economic effect of financial compensation in China’s healthcare system: comprehensive insights regarding supply and demand factors," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00496-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00496-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00496-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-024-00496-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00496-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.