IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v13y2023i1d10.1186_s13561-023-00470-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of bibliometric analysis on old adults’ cognitive impairment based on Web of Science and CNKI via CiteSpace

Author

Listed:
  • Shuyi Yan

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Mingli Pang

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Jieru Wang

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Rui Chen

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Hui Liu

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Xixing Xu

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Bingsong Li

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Qinling Li

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Fanlei Kong

    (Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University
    Shandong University
    Shandong University)

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status, the research hot spots and frontiers of cognitive impairment (CI) on old adults from 2012 to 2022 based on Web of Science (WoS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) via CiteSpace, and provide new in-sights for researchers. Methods The articles regarding the old adults’ CI in the WoS and CNKI were retrieved from 2012 to 2022. CiteSpaceV.6.1.R4 was used to generate network maps. Results Four thousand seven hundred thirteen publications and 304 publications from CNKI were retrieved. Overall, from 2012 to 2022, the trend of articles published in WoS and CNKI were increasing. Data from WoS showed that USA, University of California, Petersen RC were the most influential country, institution and author respectively; Folstein MF, Neurology and a diagnosis guideline of mild CI were the most cited author, journal and reference separately; while the keywords of CI could be summarized in 3 aspects: related disease and symptom, risk factors, manifestations. Data from CNKI illustrated that Peking Union Medical College, Dan Liu were the most influential institution and scholar respectively, while the keywords of CI could be summarized in 3 aspects: related disease and symptoms, risk factors, intervention. Conclusion Articles published on old adults’ CI were drawing an increasing amount of attention from 2012 to 2022 both in WoS and CNKI. Keywords of CI in WoS and CNKI both focused on risk factors, related disease and symptom, yet WoS contributed more to the mechanism and CNKI contributed more to the intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuyi Yan & Mingli Pang & Jieru Wang & Rui Chen & Hui Liu & Xixing Xu & Bingsong Li & Qinling Li & Fanlei Kong, 2023. "A comparative study of bibliometric analysis on old adults’ cognitive impairment based on Web of Science and CNKI via CiteSpace," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00470-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00470-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-023-00470-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-023-00470-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00470-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.