IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v13y2023i1d10.1186_s13561-023-00447-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of peer mystery shopping to increase cultural competency in community clinics offering HIV/STI testing to young men who have sex with men: results from the get connected trial

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria L. Phillips

    (Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University)

  • Ashley Xue

    (Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University)

  • Marné Castillo

    (The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia)

  • Dalia Santiago

    (Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital)

  • Taylor Wimbly

    (Morehouse School of Medicine)

  • Lisa B. Hightow-Wideman

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Rob Stephenson

    (University of Michigan)

  • José A. Bauermeister

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

Introduction Cultural competency has been identified as a barrier to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) populations seeking care. Mystery shopping has been widely employed in the formal health care sector as a quality improvement (QI) tool to address specific client needs. The approach has had limited use in community-based organizations due in part to lack of knowledge and resource requirement concerns. Several mystery shopping initiatives are now being implemented which focus on the LGBT population with the goal of reducing barriers to accessing care. One subset targets men who have sex with men (MSM) to increase uptake of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. No study investigates the costs of these initiatives. Get Connected was a randomized control trial with the objective of increasing uptake of HIV-prevention services among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) through use of a resource-locator application (App). The initial phase of the trial employed peer-led mystery shopping to identify culturally competent HIV testing sites for inclusion in the App. The second phase of the trial randomized YMSM to test the efficacy of the App. Our objective was to determine the resource inputs and costs of peer-led mystery shopping to identify clinics for inclusion in the App as costs would be critical in informing possible adoption by organizations and sustainability of this model. Methods Through consultation with study staff, we created a resource inventory for undertaking the community-based, peer-led mystery shopping program. We used activity-based costing to price each of the inputs. We classified inputs as start-up and those for on-going implementation. We calculated costs for each category, total costs and cost per mystery shopper visit for the four-month trial and annually to reflect standard budgeting periods for data collected from September of 2019 through September of 2020. Results Recruitment and training of peer mystery shoppers were the most expensive tasks. Average start-up costs were $10,001 (SD $39.8). Four-month average implementation costs per visit were $228 (SD $1.97). Average annual implementation costs per visit were 33% lower at $151 (SD $5.60). Conclusions Peer-led, mystery shopping of HIV-testing sites is feasible, and is likely affordable for medium to large public health departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria L. Phillips & Ashley Xue & Marné Castillo & Dalia Santiago & Taylor Wimbly & Lisa B. Hightow-Wideman & Rob Stephenson & José A. Bauermeister, 2023. "Cost of peer mystery shopping to increase cultural competency in community clinics offering HIV/STI testing to young men who have sex with men: results from the get connected trial," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00447-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00447-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-023-00447-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-023-00447-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00447-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.